Australia needs to manufacture motor vehicles…

By Andrew Mackinnon

Australia needs to have its own manufacturer of motor vehicles again, now that it no longer manufactures any motor vehicles in the country.  Japan hosts car manufacturing, similarly South Korea, the United States of America, Germany, France, China, Russia and the United Kingdom.  Multiple African countries also host car manufacturing – Algeria, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tunisia and Uganda.

Car manufacturing is right up near the apex of manufacturing, which is probably occupied by aircraft manufacturers.  Innovative Australian minds need something to apply their skills to.  It wouldn’t be difficult at all to build a superlative range of motor vehicles in Australia because the overwhelming majority of vehicles manufactured around the world today are poorly designed. Front-wheel drive vehicles are an engineering abomination that account for at least 60% of all motor vehicles manufactured worldwide today.  Toyota makes cars that are so ridiculously curvy that at least 20% of the potential cargo space in their vehicles is eviscerated.  Mercedez-Benz vehicles have an absurd number of unnecessary, complicated electronic systems that make them very difficult and very expensive to maintain.

I suggest an Australian car manufacturer named “Boxcar”.  Its point of difference would be the boxy design of its vehicles which maximizes their cargo space.  Instead of wildly curved sides that intrude upon potential cargo space, its sides would be mostly vertical, including its rear.  It costs a lot of money to acquire and run a motor vehicle, so it makes logical sense that its cargo space should be as large as possible to enable the vehicle to carry as much as possible.  Why would anybody want to spend all that money on their car, only to find that they can’t fit a fridge in the back?

It would be ideal for Boxcar vehicles to be made of aluminium, in order to resist corrosion and minimise weight (thus maximising their power to weight ratios), but I defer to the experts on the need for steel in the structural parts of the chassis.

Boxcar vehicles would be rear-wheel drive or four-wheel drive or all-wheel drive.  Engines would only be mounted with their crankshafts parallel to the sides of the vehicles, unlike many ghastly front-wheel drive vehicles today.

Rear-wheel drive or four-wheel drive or all-wheel drive vehicles with their engines mounted in this way are easier to maintain than front-wheel drive vehicles because the timing belt is accessible at the front of the engine bay and is therefore easier to replace. Replacement of the timing belt at the required service interval is critically important for many vehicles. Failure to replace the timing belt at the required service interval can lead to engine failure, necessitating the replacement of the engine.

There is one very important reason why front-wheel drive vehicles became the standard to be followed in the middle of the 1980s, so that the majority of passenger vehicles produced today are front-wheel drive. Front-wheel drive vehicles are more difficult to work on, making it more difficult for vehicle owners to perform their own maintenance and repairs, which would save them many thousands of dollars in the medium to long term on maintenance and repairs.

The engines that would power Boxcar vehicles would ideally be diesel engines, both reducing the risk of fire in an accident (since diesel fuel is not easily ignited) and allowing them to run on recycled cooking oil.

The transmission of the Boxcar vehicles, whether manual or automatic, should not be bolted on to the rear of the engine, but should instead be positioned just in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle. The differential would bolt on to the rear of the transmission and would drive the two rear axles (ie. constant velocity joints) that drive the rear wheels.

For vehicles with manual transmissions, the clutch would attach to the fly wheel at the rear of the crankshaft of the engine in the normal way. It would be covered by a bell housing. A propeller shaft would transmit rotational power from the engine at the front of the vehicle to the manual transmission near the rear of the vehicle. Vehicles with automatic transmissions would have a similar kind of layout except that the clutch is absent.

There are two very important advantages to positioning the transmission, whether manual or automatic, in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle.

Firstly, the weight distribution of the vehicle is dramatically improved. Instead of most of the weight of the vehicle being in the front half of the vehicle, predominated by the engine and transmission, weight is more evenly distributed between the front and rear of the vehicle. It is common knowledge that many rear-wheel drive vehicles whose transmissions are bolted on to the rear of the engine suffer from a lack of traction at the rear wheels and deficient handling as a result of a lack of weight at the rear of the vehicle.

Secondly, it is much easier to change the clutch on a vehicle whose manual transmission is positioned in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle than on a vehicle whose manual transmission is bolted on to the rear of engine. This is because one only has to remove the lightweight bell housing from the rear of the engine, after first removing the propeller shaft, in order to change the clutch on a vehicle whose manual transmission is positioned in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle. There is no need to remove and replace the very heavy manual transmission.

A good example of a vehicle whose transmission is positioned in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle is the Volvo 360, which was manufactured by Volvo from 1976 to 1991.

The rear suspension of Boxcar vehicles should be so over-engineered that the rear axles never break no matter what conditions and stresses they’re subjected to.

To open the rear hatch of any vehicle and find that there is a lip, being a difference in height between the bottom of the hatch when closed and the level of the cargo space in the rear of the vehicle, is asinine. The bottom of the rear door or doors of the vehicles that Boxcar would produce (such as two barn doors of equal size) should be at the same height as the level of the cargo space in the rear of the vehicle, so that items can be easily moved into and out of this cargo space.

Most motor vehicle manufacturers around the world today design their vehicles to wear out prematurely so that the owners will be forced to buy overpriced spare parts in order to maintain and repair them. Boxcar could earn itself a stellar reputation by designing its vehicles to last as long as possible, thus winning over the hearts and minds of people who have long since abandoned car ownership to shield themselves from this chicanery which has been going on for decades.

It is a national embarrassment that the most popular vehicles in Australia, the Toyota Corolla, the Toyota Camry, the Toyota Hilux and the Toyota Landcruiser, are all designed and manufactured many thousands of kilometres away in Japan.

I look forward to the day when the most popular vehicles in Australia are designed and built in Australia by Boxcar.

This is why the Australian economy isn’t working…

By Andrew Mackinnon

The economy in Australia was going very badly last year before the bushfires started that the government lit to distract attention away from the failing economy and before the latest Coronavirus hysteria to provide a scapegoat onto which to project the blame for the failing economies all around the world.  In Australia, the banks create money when they lend and then charge interest on it. This is the same in most countries around the world. However, the citizenry is waking up to this scam and is therefore reluctant to borrow from the banks. This has caused the size of the money supply in Australia to decrease since money is created when the banks lend and since money is destroyed when principal lent by the banks is repaid. As a result, there is insufficient money in circulation to support economic activity in Australia.  This is why the economy is languishing.

In fact, Australian citizens were reluctant to borrow from the banks even back in the 1990s in the aftermath of the recession of 1989 to 1991.  The Australian government has always responded to this reluctance not by acknowledging that the interest charged on money lent by the banks that they create out of nothing is unconscionable and unjust, but by bringing new citizens into Australia via mass immigration in the hope that they would borrow from the banks to make up the shortfall in borrowing.  It has been doing this for the past thirty years.  We are now in a situation where the Chinese who have come into the country don’t want to be in debt; the Indians who have come into the country don’t want to be in debt and the existing Australian citizens certainly don’t want to be in debt either.  Nobody wants to be in debt and why would they?  People are not stupid, even if the Australian government and the Jewish-controlled media have deliberately made it very difficult to understand how the banking system in Australia actually works.

In Australia, when banks lend for any purpose, they create that money and the size of the money supply subsequently increases.  The banks debit their loans asset account for the amount lent to signify the debt owing to them and they credit their deposits liability account to provide their customers with the amount they have lent to them so that their customers can utilise those funds in the bank accounts that they hold with the banks.  When principal lent by the banks is repaid, the customer’s deposit account out of which the payment is made decreases by the amount of the principal repaid so that the money supply in Australia decreases by this same amount.  The customer also makes interest payments out of his or her deposit account in the course of repaying the money borrowed.  These payments are credited to the revenue account of the bank that lent the customer the money and are used to pay the salaries of bank employees, with the remainder constituting the bank’s profit, out of which dividends are paid to the shareholders of the bank so that they can share in this interest revenue also.

The Reserve Bank of Australia was established in 1959 via the Reserve Bank Act.  It commenced operation early the next year on 14th January, 1960, just over 60 years ago.  The purpose of the Reserve Bank of Australia has always been to maximize the interest revenue collected by the banks under its authority, which were first publicly owned then later privately owned by shareholders.

In 2015, in Australia, which had a population of about 24 million people at the time, about $30 billion dollars was paid to the staff who run the banks and another $30 billion was earned in profits for the shareholders of these privately-owned banks, all courtesy of the fraud of interest charged on money created out of nothing and lent to the citizenry.  That’s a total of $60 billion in one year paid in interest to the banks by Australian citizens on money that the banks created out of nothing and lent to them. It’s the equivalent of $3,185 paid in 2015 by every adult citizen of Australia aged 18 years and over to the banks in interest. Around 78.5% of the population of 24 million in 2015 was aged 18 years and over, being around 18,840,000 citizens.

97% of the money in circulation in Australia, constituting the money supply, is money created by the banks when they lend for any purpose.  The other 3% is physical notes and coins.  The majority of this 97% arises from mortgage lending.  The majority of the money that banks create is the result of mortgage lending.  Mortgage lending constitutes the majority of bank lending.  When a bank lends money to a customer as a mortgage with which to purchase real estate, the customer pays the overwhelming majority of the amount borrowed to the seller of the real estate that the customer chooses to purchase.  Apart from stamp duty paid on the real estate purchase by the customer to state governments, commissions paid to real estate agents on the sale of the real estate by the seller and perhaps renovations of the real estate purchased, carried out by the customer using part of the money they have borrowed from the bank to fund their purchase of the property, the only way that newly created money as a result of mortgage lending is going to make its way into the economy and into the hands of Australian citizens is if the seller whose house has been purchased as a result of that mortgage lending spends the money they receive as a result of selling their house.  If they predominantly invest the money in assets such as real estate or shares, then the majority of the money is not going to find its way into the economy involving the day to day transactions of the majority of Australian citizens.

This problem has been even further exacerbated by the inflation of house prices as a result of increased demand for housing via mass immigration and via concessions made to property ‘investors’ (who borrow from the banks so that they can ‘invest’) via negative gearing so that they will be able to afford the repayments on their mortgages for their ‘investment’ properties, which they otherwise wouldn’t be able to afford.  They wouldn’t otherwise have sufficient cash flow to afford the repayments.  As a result of the inflation of house prices, the proportion of money in circulation in Australia as a result of mortgage lending by the banks is even higher.

In Australia, we need a money supply in which a large proportion of the money supply didn’t come into existence as a result of lending.  There are activities that occur on a regular, consistent and ongoing basis in order to support the lives of Australia citizens, such as the growing and distribution of food, the production and distribution of electricity and the accumulation and distribution of water and gas, to name just a few.  These activities need to be supported by a large proportion of the money supply that didn’t come into existence as a result of bank lending but instead came into existence as a result of government spending over time, such as payment by the government of the salaries of citizens employed in the public service in Australia.

The problem that many Australian citizens are currently experiencing is that there is insufficient money in circulation as a result of a decline in borrowing by Australian citizens from the banks.  In addition, the supply of money that is in circulation does not offer stable support to their day-to-day economic activity.  Because 97% of the money in circulation is created via bank lending, the size of the money supply is in a constant state of change.  When principal is lent by the banks, the money supply increases in size.  When principal is repaid by borrowers, the money supply decreases in size.

In contrast, money that is in circulation as a result of government spending can only be taken out of circulation if the government decides to destroy money that it has collected via taxation because it believes that there is too much money in circulation which is causing excessive inflation of prices.

The way money is created in Australia needs to change.  The Australian government should be responsible for money creation, not the privately-owned banks.  The size of the money supply in Australia shouldn’t depend on citizens borrowing money.  The only entity that should have the authority to create money in Australia and control the size of the money supply in Australia is the Australian federal government which would create money via a publicly-owned Australian Federal Bank by spending it into circulation or lending it to Australian citizens or Australian businesses for any purpose, including mortgages.  The Australian Federal Bank would not charge interest when it lends, however it would need to charge a rate in the vicinity of 0.5% to 1% on all lending to cover the incidence of default on the loans by the borrowers.  This rate would be different for different types of lending, such as mortgages and business loans.  The sole purpose of this rate would be to cover the incidence of default on loans (ie. non-repayment of principal borrowed), not to profit from the lending.

There would have to be some mechanism for limiting government lending to the citizenry since the publicly-owned Australian Federal Bank would create all of the money that it lends so that the money supply increases when it lends. Unrestrained lending would lead to a rapidly increasing money supply and associated inflation of prices.

Citizens would be able to borrow in order to buy a house to live in and possibly a holiday house but they wouldn’t be allowed to borrow in order to buy a house as an investment to rent out in order to earn income. Investment would need to be funded out of savings, including houses and shares to name just two investments.

The amount that the Australian Federal Bank would lend to any given citizen for any given purpose, such as buying a house to live in, would be limited by factors such as the income of the citizen and the size of the deposit that the citizen has saved towards the purchase, with zero dollars obviously being the minimum possible size of the deposit saved. The Australian Federal Bank would decide upon the multiple of any given citizen’s income (such as three times) to lend to them for any given purpose, such as buying a house to live in or buying a motor vehicle.

If necessary, the Australian government could also create money and bring it into circulation in order to increase the money suppy by giving the money to the citizenry in proportion to the amount of net tax they’ve paid during their lives, defined as tax paid minus money received from the government in this manner as a result of money creation by the government.

The Australian Federal Bank would be run on a not-for-profit basis whereby the cost of running its operation would be covered by transaction fees and account keeping fees that reflect the true costs incurred by the bank to process transactions and maintain the accounts of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and other entities such as publicly-owned utilities, public service organisations and local government areas.

There would no longer be any need for the Australian government to borrow money by issuing government bonds to those from who it borrows, as is currently the case.  This borrowing needs to repaid with interest (ie. principal and interest) out of taxation revenue, paid by the citizenry, when the Australian government could easily create this money to fund its spending requirements without requiring the citizenry to repay it via taxation or pay interest on it via taxation.

Our current predicament in which privately-owned banks create money out of nothing when they lend and then charge interest on it is a Jewish fraud whose perpetrators are committed to protecting it at all costs.  The Coronavirus hoax has been instigated worldwide in order to provide a reason for the failing economies around the world which draws attention away from the real reason – insufficient money in circulation in countries all around the world as a result of insufficient borrowing from the privately-owned banks by citizens in countries all around the world who rightfully view the banks with distrust and disdain.

Providing a sound monetary system for the citizenry is one of the most important services that a sound government is obligated to provide.  There is absolutely no reason whatsoever why any money in circulation should obligate citizens to pay interest on it, whether interest to privately-owned banks or interest to bondholders.  When citizens pay interest to privately-owned banks as a result of money borrowed, they receive nothing of value in return, because the money lent to them was created out of nothing by the banks.  This is a cleverly-disguised system of slavery whereby the citizenry work to earn the money required to pay the interest without receiving anything of value in return for that money.  The recipients of the interest paid, being the bank employees and the shareholders of the banks, use the interest paid to buy the goods and services that the citizenry produce in the course of earning the money to pay the interest.  This is a massive transfer of wealth from those paying the interest to those receiving the interest.  Over the course of repaying a mortgage on a house, a borrower from a privately-owned bank under our current banking system pays in the vicinity of 80% of the principal amount borrowed in interest to the bank.  This borrower repays the principal amount borrowed and also pays an additional amount to the bank as interest equivalent to around 80% of the principal amount borrowed.

If the principal amount borrowed is $500,000, the total amount repaid to the bank over the life of the mortgage is around $900,000.  When the bank lent the $500,000 principal, a bank employee processed the paperwork and typed the $500,000 into a computer so that this money, created out of nothing with a few keystrokes, was available in the account of the borrower.  In return for this negligible amount of work to lend the $500,000, the bank is repaid $900,000, which includes $400,000 in interest.  About half of the interest of $400,000 is paid to bank employees as salaries and the remaining $200,000 is booked as profit, out of which dividends are paid to the bank’s shareholders.

We have been living under slave conditions for decades now.  The Coronavirus hysteria is intended to keep us in slave conditions by providing a reason for the failing economies around the world which distracts from the real reason – the Jewish fraud of interest charged by the banks on money created out of nothing when they lend.  The Jewish perpetrators of the Coronavirus hysteria intend to start new monetary systems in countries around the world in the aftermath of this hoax which similarly enshrine this Jewish fraud as their centerpieces.

I put a letter into a red Australia Post box and fell down a rabbit hole

By Andrew Mackinnon

I put a letter into a red Australia Post box on the street today and was very surprised to see that the times after which the box gets emptied have changed.  It used to be 6pm on weekdays and Sunday but now it’s 3pm on weekdays and 12pm on Sundays.  I guess they don’t want their drivers being out so late on the roads when the roads are very busy around 6pm with everybody coming back from work during the week and when the sun has gone down so that it’s dark during the months that don’t fall under daylight savings.

So, when I got back home, I went to the Australia Post website to find an official statement relating to these new times.  I brought up the home page of the Australia Post website, being http://auspost.com.au, and was very interested to observe that this home page contains various photos showing five adults and one child.  Here’s the breakdown:

  • Of the five adults, one was male (ie. 20%) and four were female (ie. 80%).  (Note that in real life, about 50% of the population is male and 50% of the population is female.)
  • Of the five adults, one was white, Anglo-Saxon (ie. 20%) and the other four were non-white, non-Anglo-Saxon (ie. 80%).  The white, Anglo-Saxon adult was female.  Back in the real world (you know, the one in which Australia Post delivers letters), more than 50% of the population of Australia is white Anglo-Saxon. 
  • There were no (ie. zero) white, Anglo-Saxon, adult males shown on the home page of the Australia Post website, whereas white, Anglo-Saxon, adult males easily constitute more than 16% of the population of Australia.
  • Of the five adults, shown, three of them were looking at a smartphone and giggling about something they obviously found very funny.  (They were probably looking at the home page of the Australia Post website and laughing at the absence of white, Anglo-Saxon, adult males.)  Another one of them was sitting on a couch looking delightedly into an Australia Post package.  The last adult was drinking out of a coconut through a straw while wearing sunglasses.
  • The child was a five to seven year old white, Anglo-Saxon male with blonde hair who was wearing bright yellow socks, bright red shorts, a musk (ie. pink) and grey-striped long-sleeve t-shirt and, I kid you not, white bunny ears on his head.  So I guess the joke’s on him.

Who do think has historically delivered the bulk of the mail in Australia for Australia Post?  White, Anglo-Saxon males.

So, what they should have done is take the bunny ears off the kid and give him some normal clothes for boys so that he can feel proud of his masculinity.  They should have replaced the woman drinking out of a coconut with a white-as-a-ghost, Anglo-Saxon, female teenager, in order to promote a realistic age distribution.  Then, because non-citizens are inevitably going to find themselves being deported due to popular sentiment finally heading in the right direction, they should have gotten rid of the woman on the couch and replaced her with a white, Anglo-Saxon, adult male wearing a long-sleeve, open-necked, white, cotton shirt and beige trousers – irresistible fashion sense.  Lastly, they should have put the white, Anglo-Saxon woman (who was looking at the smartphone) next to him on the couch and pretended that they were a married couple.  It’s not like white, Anglo-Saxons are doing so great as a demographic cohort in their own country, so why not plug marriage and hope for more little, white Anglo-Saxons to be flitting about the place in the future?

Try as I might, I had no success in finding an official statement on the website relating to the times after which the red Australia Post boxes in the street are emptied.  This is evidence writ large of a formerly great institution gone bad.

When I visited the website, being http://auspost.com.au, using my Firefox web browser, I also received a warning from the browser which said, “Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead”.  So, I clicked on “Accept the Risk and Continue” and reached the website.  It seems to me the security risk is that Australia Post is trying to undermine the white, Anglo-Saxon heritage of Australia.

Australia Post used to be one of the most highly respected, if not the most highly respected, government-run institution in Australia but those days are long gone.  The frontline staff still command respect with their exemplary customer service but the management is rotten.  What happens when a good institution goes bad is that somebody like me goes to do something as simple as post a letter and ends up feeling compelled to spend an hour and a half documenting everything glaringly wrong with the entity involved, Australia Post, and another hour after that publishing it to the internet and editing it.  Two and a half hours!  How much is the executive responsible for customer service and public relations at Australia Post getting paid?

The current Chief Executive Officer of Australia Post is Christine Holgate.  While I can’t find any conclusive evidence that she has Jewish ancestry, which is what I’d really like to find to explain the mess that Australia Post is in, it’s obvious to me that she’s deliberately running Australia Post in accordance with a highly ideological agenda that is biased against the encumbent white, Anglo-Saxon population of Australia.

Here’s the deal.  The Australian government ramped up mass immigration in a dramatic manner from about 2009 onwards, which is about ten years ago.  Back then, I didn’t have any clear idea about what was really happening in and to this nation.  I didn’t work most of it out until 2014. (I should have started this website five years ago instead of putting it off. However, during the past five years, I’ve been working in other ways to raise awareness, such as by sending out emails and commenting on websites.) My point is that the government has only been delivering the final killer blow for about ten years.  The overwhelming majority of the population are now fully aware of the manner in which their best interests are being subverted by mass immigration.  By no means is it too late to reverse much of the damage that has already been done, but we need to act now. Not in six months’ time. Not in a year’s time.  Now.  What the Australian government sneeringly refers to as a “populist movement” (meaning the majority opinion of Australian citizens, which is a foundational democratic concept) is a tidal force which can effect the changes that need to take place in this nation:

1. Prohibit non-citizens from owning real estate in Australia.

2. Deport non-citizens from Australia.

3. Restrict immigration to people who can speak, read and write English and who aren’t of Chinese, Indian, otherwise Asian or African ethnicity and who aren’t Muslims.

(Policy on refugees is separate and should include not participating in wars that create refugees, such as World War I, World War II, the Korean war, the Vietnam war, the Afghanistan war, the Iraq war and the Syria war, and helping refugees in their country of origin where possible.)

4. Limit trade with other countries to that which is in the best interests of Australia.

5. Buy back foreign-owned assets in Australia that are owned by non-English speaking entities, such as Chinese-owned real estate, Chinese-owned ports and Chinese-owned electricity infrastructure.

My children were threatened and I just wanted them out

Source: The Sydney Morning Herald

Author: Elizabeth Farrelly

Date: 7th December, 2019

smh.com.au/national/my-children-were-threatened-and-i-just-wanted-them-out-20191205-p53h3m.html

Comment from Andrew Mackinnon on this article:

The beds are burning (because the government deliberately set them on fire). Something something ‘climate change’. [Insert endearing anecdote here.]  Please download your required scripted response from thegovandthemediaaremakingout.com/wetellyouwhattothink and study it carefully.  Modifying your attitude and behaviour is a matter of urgency.  Polar bears, penguins and koalas are depending on you!

Buying a house is not the only major milestone Australians are delaying

Source: The Sydney Morning Herald

Author: Matt Wade

Date: 1st December, 2019

smh.com.au/national/buying-a-house-is-not-the-only-major-milestone-australians-are-delaying-20191129-p53fjb.html

Comment from Andrew Mackinnon on this article:

The Australian government has done everything possible over the past four decades to discourage Australian citizens from getting married and having children.  As a result, the birth rate in Australia has declined dramatically over this time.  The Australian government, acting on behalf of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan, actively sought this decline in the birth rate in order to provide the justification it needed to dramatically increase immigration from China, India and other Asian countries.  Its ultimate strategy behind immigration into Australia is to displace and replace the existing Anglo-Saxon population of Australian citizens and its Christian culture and heritage.  The ultimate target of this subversion is the expression of Christian faith in Australia and the accompanying sovereignty of Australia.

The Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan wants to merge Australia into an Asia-Pacific Union including China, India, Australia and other Asian countries.  The Australian government is using mass immigration into Australia from China and India in order to change the racial composition of its population and make it easier to establish an Asia-Pacific Union, ruled over by world government.

The author of this article, Matt Wade, secretly has Jewish ancestry and secretly self-identifies as Jewish (like Scott Morrison and Ross Gittins, to name just two others) which is why he is absolutely committed to supporting a false mainstream media narrative which obscures the real reasons for Australia’s declining birth rate over the past four decades.  It’s not difficult to look into Matt Wade’s eyes and see somebody who is wholeheartedly committed to obfuscation.

The Australian government has utilised several different methods to reduce the birth rate in Australian over the past forty years in order to provide the justification it needed to dramatically increase immigration from China, India and other Asian countries into Australia.

The Australian government has approved a very bloated secondary school curriculum which means that students don’t finish secondary school until the age of eighteen years.  It should be sixteen years of age, two years earlier. Naturally, this leads to a delay in the age at which Australian citizens get married and have children. The legal age of adulthood should be lowered from eighteen years to sixteen years and citizens should be eligible to obtain a provisional drivers license at the age of sixteen years, not seventeen years.

The Australian government has approved the operation of single-sex schools, particularly single-sex secondary schools, in which males and females are cruelly separated from each other during their teenage years.  Single-sex schools serve to dramatically reduce the capacity of the students who attend them to relate effectively to their peers of the opposite gender, so that when they finish secondary school at the age of eighteen years, they are unprepared for adult life and must learn to relate effectively to their peers of the opposite gender as fully-grown adults.  This naturally postpones the age at which Australian citizens have been getting married, which should be around the age of 20 to 24 years.

The Australian government has approved the distribution of pornography throughout Australian society, starting in earnest in the 1980s.  During the 1980s, hard-copy pornography was distributed via newsagents and petrol stations throughout Australia.  Despite its immense political influence at that time, the Jewish-controlled Church of England in Australia, also known as the Anglican church, approved of this subversion and did nothing to stop it.  Widespread exposure to this material among adolescent males, particularly males attending single-sex schools, reduced their ability to relate effectively to their peers of the opposite gender, which led to a delay in the age at which they later married while they learned how to relate to females in a healthy and wholesome way.  Of course, hard-copy pornography has now been replaced by internet pornography, which is probably a large part of the reason why the internet was established for use by the general public in the first place.

The increase in the cost of university education has meant that it takes university graduates longer to save up for a deposit in order to buy a house because their income is reduced by the increased repayments for their university education.  This leads to a delay in purchasing a house which, in turn, leads to a delay in getting married and having children, since most people want to get married and own their own home instead of rent and be answerable to a landlord.  The permanency of the marriage relationship is best suited, in the eyes of most married couples, to a permanent place to live which is owned rather than rented.

The Australian government has deliberately inflated house prices over the past four decades with the explicit objective of making it more difficult for Australian citizens to own their own homes so that they are less likely to get married and have children.  The principal ways in which it has achieved this objective have been by allowing the banks to lend for the purpose of the borrowers buying ‘investment’ properties, which has increased demand for ‘investment’ properties (dubiously financed with borrowings instead of savings like investment should be), the introduction of negative gearing in the mid-1980s (by allowing property ‘investors’ to deduct their losses against unrelated forms of income like salaries from employment, making ‘investment’ properties more affordable) to increase demand for ‘investment’ properties and mass immigration over the past three decades to dramatically increase the population of Australia and thereby increase demand for housing in general.

It is completely obvious that the Australian government has waged open warfare as a representative of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan against the institution of marriage over the past four decades.  It has done everything possible to prevent Australian citizens from settling down, getting married and enjoying the unparalleled bliss of sexual relations in marriage between husband and wife as the analog on earth of the union of Jesus Christ and the church in heaven.

Our fear of China is not loathing

Source: The Sydney Morning Herald

Author: Peter Hartcher

Date: 30th November, 2019

smh.com.au/politics/federal/our-fear-of-china-is-not-loathing-20191129-p53fiv.html

Comment from Andrew Mackinnon on this article:

The author of this article, Peter Hartcher, secretly has Jewish ancestry and secretly self-identifies as Jewish (like Scott Morrison and Ross Gittins, to name just two others) which is why, in spite of anything he writes pretending otherwise, he is absolutely committed to Australia being swamped as a result of mass immigration from China as a means of facilitating its inclusion in an Asia-Pacific Union, including China, India, Australia and all of the other Asian countries. An Asia-Pacific Union is required by the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan in order to establish world government ruling over the various intended unions of the world. (The synagogue of Satan also wants to establish a North American Union, including the United States of America, Canada and Mexico. It has already established a European Union, a South American Union and an African Union.)

Five years ago, there were Australian citizens complaining about mass immigration from China and about non-citizens being legally allowed by the Australian government to purchase and own real estate in Australia, such as citizens of China who are not citizens of Australia. They were unceremoniously ignored by the mainstream media in Australia, such as the Sydney Morning Herald, who took great delight in censoring the comments that these Australian citizens submitted for publication on their websites, by deleting them and refusing point-blank to publish them.

Five years later, now that a larger proportion of Australians have realised the manner in which their country has been trampled upon as a result of mass immigration from China and as a result of Chinese ownership of Australian assets, like real estate, ports and electricity infrastructure, the media sits up and takes notice. This article is Peter Hartcher’s attempt to pretend to care about the damage that Australia has sustained over the past three decades as a result of its entanglement with China – a communist country that ruthlessly dominates its citizenry and which habitually suppresses freedom of expression of Chinese citizens who adhere to the Christian faith.

Peter Hartcher asks, “What to do, exactly?”, in relation to China’s increasing domination of Australia economically through ownership of Australia’s real estate, ports and electricity infrastructure and culturally through mass immigration from China which has swamped Australia with Chinese and caused widespread congestion, as well as escalating house prices over the past two decades due to increased demand for housing from non-citizens of Australia, who have been legally allowed by the Australian government to own real estate in Australia, in spite of their lack of Australian citizenship.

“What to do, exactly?” It’s really very simple:

1. Prohibit non-citizens from owning real estate in Australia.

2. Deport non-citizens from Australia, including Chinese non-citizens.

3. Restrict immigration to people who can speak, read and write English and who aren’t of Chinese, Indian, otherwise Asian or African ethnicity and who aren’t Muslims. (Policy on refugees is separate and should include not participating in wars that create refugees, such as World War I, World War II, the Korean war, the Vietnam war, the Afghanistan war, the Iraq war and the Syria war, and helping refugees in their country of residence where possible.)

4. Stop all trade with China or limit trade with China to that which is in the best interests of Australia.

5. Buy back Chinese-owned assets in Australia, such as real estate, ports and electricity infrastructure.

The recent bushfires in NSW were deliberately lit in order to build support for ‘climate change’ policy

By Andrew Mackinnon

The recent bushfires in New South Wales were deliberately lit in order to promote the idea that ‘climate change’ is the threat which caused them and that Australia therefore needs to enact policy to deal with ‘climate change’ so as to prevent further devastation.  In turn, the fraud of ‘carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is being used to distract the attention of the citizenry away from the failing economy and the very damaging effects of mass immigration on the country.  ‘Climate change’ is being cast as an even more pressing issue than the failing economy so that the government isn’t held accountable by the citizenry for its woeful leadership.

It’s irrelevant who was caught lighting the fires, even if they were youths.  These are third party intermediaries used for plausible deniability, unless they are fabrications who don’t even exist.  The Australian government is behind the deliberate lighting of these fires.  Does anybody seriously believe that the entire state was thrown into chaos because a bunch of tweens and teens, scattered across the state, suddenly had a collective epiphany to burn the place to the ground?  It’s nonsense.  This was a co-ordinated campaign of destruction using arsonists of whatever age, whether real or fabricated, as scapegoats for the real perpetrator – the Australian government.

Look at the flare up in the Jewish-controlled media linking the fires to ‘climate change’.  It’s obvious.  First, school children in Australia protested about ‘climate change’ and that fell flat.  Then Greta Thunberg travelled to the United Nations in a yacht to protest about ‘climate change’ and that fell flat, because nobody wants to be lectured by a sixteen year old being fed a bunch of lines by adult propagandists.  So, the people who want policy to be enacted in Australia regarding ‘climate change’ said to each other, “They ignored the school children.  They even ignored Greta!  Let’s give them something they can’t ignore.”

The Sydney Morning Herald went bananas linking the bushfires to ‘climate change’.  It’s owned by Nine Entertainment Co., whose chairman is former Treasurer, Liberal Party representative and crypto-Jew, Peter Costello.  The linkage between ‘climate change’ and the bushfires is quite obviously approved by the Liberal Party, albeit secretly.  Does anybody seriously believe that the journalists at the Sydney Morning Herald sat around twiddling their thumbs waiting for bushfires to occur so that they could write about the destructive influence of ‘climate change’?  It is well known by now that these fires were deliberately lit.  They were deliberately lit by the Australian government, then the order was given for journalists to link the bushfires to ‘climate change’.  Responsible journalism would have linked the fires first and foremost to arson, but responsible journalism didn’t occur.  Why?  Because these fires were deliberately lit to build public support for the enactment of policy regarding ‘climate change’.

Australian citizens voted Liberal over Labor at the last federal election because they didn’t want the action on ‘climate change’ that Labor was promoting.  The majority think that ‘carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is a fraud, like I do.  (Carbon dioxide exists in the earth’s atmosphere at less than 400 parts per million, which is less than 1 part per 2,500, so it doesn’t influence the climate to any appreciable extent.)  Australians voted the Liberal Party into federal government at the last federal election earlier this year because it’s the lesser of two very bad evils.  Scott Morrison is an appalling Prime Minister but Bill Shorten would have been twice as bad.

The Liberal Party pretends to be opposed to action on ‘climate change’ but that is only pretence.  It knows that the majority of Australian citizens don’t trust the ‘climate change’ agenda, so it has pretended to adopt the same mistrust in order to win their support.  Therefore, if it’s going to be successful enacting policy on ‘climate change’, it needs to resort to indirect methods of lobbying the citizenry, such as deliberately lighting bushfires and then relying on the media to push the narrative that ‘climate change’ is the reason for the fires.  The Liberal Party wants to end up in a position in which it is seen as having no choice but to enact policy to deal with ‘climate change’, since ‘climate change’ has become universally recognised as a threat by the citizenry due to high-impact incidents like the bushfires in New South Wales.

The Liberal Party supports action on ‘climate change’ because its allegiance is to the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan that needs action on ‘climate change’ in countries around the world in order to provide an excuse for establishing world government ruling over various unions around the world like the European Union, the African Union and the South American Union.  There is a planned Asia-Pacific Union including China, India and Australia, as well as other Asian countries.  There is also a planned North American Union including the United States of America, Canada and Mexico.  ‘Climate change’ is the fabricated threat to the entire world which the synagogue of Satan will claim can only be properly addressed with common policies and methodologies enforced and implemented by world government.  The Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan has been pushing the fraudulent ‘climate change’ agenda in earnest since 2008 and it’s had this issue simmering away in various forms for the past three decades and longer.

The bushfires in New South Wales also serve to deliberately distract the attention of the citizenry away from the failing economy in Australia and on to this latest manufactured crisis.  Jews thrive on crisis.  They don’t want the Gentiles to exercise their minds and analyse all of the ways in which they’re being done over and then take action to fix them.  The resentment expressed by Australian citizens in recent weeks about mass immigration and the failing economy was quickly becoming unmanageable for the Australian government.  The bushfires sprang up out of nowhere and put an end to that daily discussion which was gathering momentum like an avalanche.  When the citizenry are winning the argument against the government narrative, which is completely dismissive of the long-suffering of the citizenry, the government knocks all the pieces off the chess board like a petulant child by lighting the bushfires and storms off.

In a short time, the government will say, “At this time of year in which Christmas is upon us, let’s turn our thoughts to our fellow citizens and think of ways in which we can reach out and help those doing it tough, like the bushfire victims who have lost everything.”  In the midst of the bushfire crisis, it all sounds very noble, until one realises that it was the government that deliberately created this crisis by lighting the fires.

The Goods & Services Tax in Australia (GST) is double taxation of income

By Andrew Mackinnon

The Goods & Services Tax in Australia (GST) is double taxation of income on which income tax has already been paid.  The government wasn’t satisfied with the income tax that citizens paid on their earnings.  It wanted more.  So, on 1st July, 2000, it introduced the GST to tax the income that the citizenry have left after they’ve already paid income tax.  This is an attack on the property rights of the citizenry over the income that they earn.  The citizenry earn income and are obligated to pay income tax to the government to fund their common needs.  One would hope that they have property rights over their remaining income, but no!  The government wants more and the citizenry are on the hook for 1/11 in GST of all of the goods and services they purchase with their after-tax income.

Life is too short for tawdry complexity, such as multiple taxes on the citizenry – income tax, GST, CGT (Capital Gains Tax), company tax and fuel tax.  There should just be one tax – income tax.

Capital gains tax is in direct opposition to property rights.  If somebody saves up some money and then invests it in shares (or anything for that matter), they quite obviously don’t have full property rights to it because if they later sell it for more than they paid for it, the government wants a cut of the gain via capital gains tax.  If they had full property rights to it, they could sell it and keep the full amount they receive for it without paying any capital gains tax.

Company tax should be abolished.  There should be no tax whatsoever on business profits (ie. sole traders, partnerships, companies, corporations et cetera).  Distributions made to owners of the business out of business profits (ie. proprietors, partners, shareholders et cetera) should be taxed as income of those owners of the business.

Fuel tax should be abolished, despite that it’s an effective means of funding road construction and maintenance.  Everybody in society benefits from roads and the transport of goods that they make possible, including those who don’t drive vehicles, so roads should be paid for out of income tax.  Just like the GST, fuel tax is double taxation of income since it’s paid for by the citizenry out of their after-tax income.

Who wants to work more than one day out of five to support the needs of the nation via income taxation?  It’s not necessary.  There should be a flat rate of income taxation of no more than 20% on all income earned above the tax-free threshold.  That’s even progressive.  With a tax-free threshold of $18,200 per year, somebody earning $40,000 per year pays 10.9% of their income in income tax, whereas somebody earning $90,000 per year pays 16.0% of their income in income tax.  As somebody else has well said, there should be no deductions allowed from income.

If anybody wonders how we could possibly fund our common needs with a flat rate of income tax of 20% on all income above the tax-free threshold, I’ll tell you.  Don’t provide the entities responsible for delivering government projects with super profits, such as the $50 billion that the federal government committed for a fleet of twelve submarines earlier this year.  Start looking at the largest amounts to find waste in government spending and work your way down – all the way down.  Government spending could easily be reduced by 60% with no reduction in the quality of government services provided.

Banking, water, electricity, gas, telecommunications and the postal service should all be publicly owned and charged to the end-user citizenry at cost so that no income tax would be required to fund the operating costs of these essential services.

In the case of banking, no interest would be charged on lending for any purpose, however a rate of less than 1% would be required on all lending to cover the incidence of defaulting loans.  The operating costs of what would be the “Australian Federal Bank” could be covered by transaction fees which would be restricted to the actual costs incurred by the bank to process the transactions of the citizenry.

Half of the funding for hospitals should come from income tax.  The other half should come from the end-users at cost – the patients.  Similarly, half of the funding for schools, TAFE (Technical and Further Education) and universities should come from income tax.  The other half should come from the end-users at cost – the parents of the students and the students themselves.  Other government services like the legal system, the police force and defence would be funded via income tax.  Following is the full list of government services, together with the sources of their funding that I propose.  It’s probably not exhaustive.

> Local Government – Local Government Rates

> Local Parks – Local Government Rates

> Local Waste & Recycling Collection – Local Government Rates

> Federal Airports (Currently privatised) – User Pays – ?

> Federal Banking System (Currently privatised) – User Pays – Transaction Fees

> Federal Buses – User Pays – Ticket Cost

> Federal Department of Maritime Vessels – User Pays – Maritime Vessel Registration

> Federal Department of Motor Vehicles – Federal – User Pays – Motor Vehicle Registration

> Federal Electricity (Currently privatised) – User Pays – Electricity Bill

> Federal National Parks – User Pays – Entry Cost

> Federal Ports (Currently privatised) – User Pays – ?

> Federal Postal System – User Pays – Postage Cost

> Federal Railways – User Pays – Ticket Cost

> Federal Telecommunications (Currently privatised) – User Pays – Telephone Bill

> Federal Water & Sewerage – User Pays – Water Bill

> Federal Hospitals – Half Income Tax, Half User Pays

> Federal Schools – Half Income Tax, Half User Pays

> Federal TAFE – Half Income Tax, Half User Pays

> Federal Universities – Half Income Tax, Half User Pays

> Federal Border Patrol – Income Tax

> Federal Customs – Income Tax

> Federal Defence – Income Tax

> Federal Department of Foreign Affairs – Income Tax

> Federal Parliament – Income Tax

> Federal Treasury – Income Tax

> Federal Fire Service – Income Tax

> Federal Legal System – Income Tax

> Federal Police – Income Tax

> Federal Prisons – Income Tax

> Federal Roads – Income Tax

> Federal Welfare – Pensions – Income Tax

> Federal Welfare – Unemployment Benefits – Income Tax

We don’t need state government.  We only need federal government and local government.  The Australian Capital Territory has already had its shot at hosting the federal government.  The results have been disheartening, to say the least.  The location of the federal government should be moved to somewhere more uplifting like the Sunshine Coast, provided the locals actually approve.  They should get a say.

The only way I can think of paying off the current gargantuan government debt to bondholders is “monetising the debt”, whereby the federal government simply creates the money needed to pay it off.  I believe that this enormous debt is a trap which has been deliberately set for the citizenry over the past three decades and longer.  Perhaps this monetisation could occur in many stages to stagger its inflationary effect due to the associated increase in the money supply.

Economic policy in Australia has been dysfunctional for decades – driven by opportunistic expediency instead of sound reasoning governed by a sound set of principles.  Nevertheless, it’s not too late to fix the desperate mess this country is in.