Vote fraud perpetrated by the Democrats in the state of Wisconsin during the 2020 United States Presidential Election…

By Andrew Mackinnon

Last updated: 12th November, 2020

When Wisconsin temporarily stopped counting the votes on the night of the 2020 United States Presidential Election, Tuesday, November 3rd, Trump was 116,148 votes ahead of Biden in Wisconsin with a 51% share of the vote (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).  At that time, Biden had a 47% share of the vote (accounting for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

Source:

President Donald Trump’s election night remarks, ABC News – News Ticker:

27 second mark

By Monday, November 9th, Trump’s lead in Wisconsin had been dramatically eliminated.  Furthermore, Trump was now trailing Biden by 20,540 votes so that Trump had just a 49% share of the vote (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

Source:

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

Wisconsin

Election night, Tuesday, November 3rd

Republican vote count and vc %  1,481,434  52.0%

Democratic vote count and vc %  1,365,286  48.0%

Monday, November 9th

Republican vote count and vc %  1,610,030  49.7%

Democratic vote count and vc %  1,630,570  50.3%

Difference, Election night to Present

Republican vote count and vc %  128,596  32.6%

Democratic vote count and vc %  265,284  67.4%

Sources of data:

President Donald Trump’s election night remarks, ABC News – News Ticker:

27 second mark                                                                  

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

Notes:

The vote counts above for Wisconsin on election night, Tuesday, November 3rd, have been obtained from their first appearance in the news ticker in the video above of President Donald Trump’s election night remarks at the 27 second mark.

“vc %” stands for “vote count percentage”

For the purpose of calculating the vote count percentages, vote counts for parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party have been ignored.

The only way that the Democrats could have made up Trump’s lead of 116,148 votes and establish their lead at the present time of 20,540 votes, is if they engaged in large-scale vote fraud involving tens of thousands of manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor the Democrats and added to the count of legitimate votes in counties in Wisconsin after the counting was temporarily stopped on the night of the election.

However, the Democrats had to do more than make up these 116,148 votes, as well as establish their lead at the present time of 20,540 votes.  The vote counting in all of the numerous counties in Wisconsin recommenced after election night and then continued on in the days after election night.  Therefore, the Democrats had to also make up the lead that Trump achieved within this counting in Wisconsin from the time that the vote counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time, assuming that the share of the vote that Trump achieved during this period, discounting the manufactured, fraudulent ballots that the Democrats had added to the count of legitimate votes, was the same as the share of the vote that Trump achieved by the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election, which was 51% (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

This means that the number of fraudulent ballots that the Democrats had to manufacture and add to the count of legitimate votes was equal to

116,148 + 20,540 + {128,596 – [(128,596 / 0.51) * 0.47]}

which equals

116,148 + 20,540 + 10,086 (rounded up to the nearest whole)

which equals

146,774

This calculation is based on the assumption that all legitimate votes for Trump that had not yet been counted at the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election were counted during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time and that they were not otherwise fraudulently set aside without being counted or fraudulently destroyed without being counted.

This calculation is also based on the assumption that no legitimate votes for Trump were fraudulently subtracted from the count of legitimate votes during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time after having already been previously counted, either before the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election or after the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election.

It is highly likely that the first assumption above is not valid and it is uncertain as to whether the second assumption above is not valid.  Therefore it is highly likely that the number of fraudulent ballots that the Democrats manufactured and added to the count of legitimate votes is less than the number calculated above of 146,774.

For every legitimate vote for Trump that had not yet been counted at the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election and that was fraudulently set aside without being counted or fraudulently destroyed without being counted during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time, the Democrats needed to add one less manufactured, fraudulent ballot that was marked to favor the Democrats to the count of legitimate votes.

For every legitimate vote for Trump that was fraudulently subtracted from the count of legitimate votes during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time after having already been previously counted, either before the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election or after the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election, the Democrats needed to add one less manufactured, fraudulent ballot that was marked to favor the Democrats to the count of legitimate votes.

In order to make up Trump’s lead over Biden on the night of the election of 116,148 votes and establish Biden’s lead over Trump at the present time of 20,540 votes, as well as make up Trump’s lead over Biden during the period of counting from the night of the election to the present time of 10,086 votes, the Democrats could have

added 146,774 (say 148,000) manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor Biden

or

destroyed 146,774 (say 148,000) legitimate votes that favored Trump

The problem with both of these two options is that they would have both distorted the vote total for the relevant counties in which this fraud is perpetrated (ie. total number of votes cast in these counties) by increasing this total by 148,000 or reducing this total by 148,000, which would also distort the voter turnouts (percentages) for the relevant counties.  These distortions can attract suspicion from poll observers and interested third parties.

If the Democrats added 74,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor Biden (ie. half of 148,000)

and

if the Democrats destroyed 74,000 legitimate votes that favored Trump (ie. half of 148,000)

then the vote totals for the relevant counties (ie. total number of votes cast in these counties) in which this fraud is perpetrated would remain unchanged and the voter turnouts (percentages) for the relevant counties would not be distorted.

Irrespective of whether the Democrats made up the votes they needed using 148,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, or half this number, being 74,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, the vote fraud that the Democrats have quite obviously perpetrated in the state of Wisconsin involves a significant number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats.

The most straightforward way for the Democrats to add such a significant number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots in with the existing legitimate ballots in Wisconsin is to add them to the counts of legitimate votes in counties in Wisconsin with the largest populations where it is commonly assumed, based on past performance in previous elections, that the Democrat vote count will exceed the Republican vote count.  It is important that these counties have large populations, because there is a significant number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots to be added to the counts of legitimate votes in these counties.  It would not be as straightforward to add these manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the counts of legitimate votes in many counties with smaller populations because the normal total number of votes cast is too small to accommodate a significant number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots or even a portion of them.  Namely, the number of Republican votes is too low to be able to destroy the required number of legitimate Trump votes or the total number of Democrat votes is too small to be able to add the required number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, without pushing the Democrat vote total percentage up too high and attracting suspicion.

Note that it is also possible to add manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the count of legitimate votes in counties in which the Republicans are leading in the vote count.  Due to my lack of experience and knowledge in this area of vote fraud, I cannot discount the possibility that this is occurring in Wisconsin.  However, I believe it is more likely that these manufactured, fraudulent ballots are being added to counties in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count.  The reason for this belief is that adding such ballots to counties in which the Republicans are leading in the vote count could directly cause the Democrats to become the leaders in the vote count in those counties.  Such an outcome would likely be inconsistent with the expectations of voting citizens in those counties, based on their knowledge of the voting intentions of their peers in those counties, and could therefore attract suspicion amongst citizens in those counties of the perpetration of vote fraud in those counties.

I cannot overstate that it is of critical importance to note that an inevitable result of adding manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, to the count of legitimate votes in any given county will always increase the percentage of total votes favoring the Democrats in that county.  Adding a larger number of these manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the count of legitimate votes in any given county will increase this percentage by an even larger amount in that county.

For this reason, counties in Wisconsin in which Democrats are leading in their counts of legitimate votes and in which manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, have been added to their counts of legitimate votes will tend to have higher percentages of the total number of votes favoring the Democrats than other counties in Wisconsin in which the Democrats are leading in their counts of legitimate votes and in which no manufactured, fraudulent ballots have been added to their counts of legitimate votes.

It is inevitable that the larger the number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, that are added to the count of legitimate votes in a county in which Democrats are leading in this count, the higher the percentage share of the total votes that the Democrats receive will be pushed up.  As the number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots that are added to the count of legitimate votes increases, the higher this percentage is pushed up and, as a direct consequence, the more suspicious observers of the vote count become about the integrity of the vote count having been compromised by vote fraud.

If you click on the map of Wisconsin on the following web page, you can see the counties in which the Democrats are leading, obviously in blue:

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

If you hover your mouse cursor over a county, the name of the county together with the current vote tallies for the county appear.

The extensive vote fraud that has been perpetrated by the Democrats in Wisconsin involved manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats and that were added to the count of legitimate votes in blue counties with large populations and with what are now large Democrat leads in the vote count as a direct result of the addition of these fraudulent ballots.  These blue counties in Wisconsin in which the Democrats have committed extensive vote fraud may include:

Dane County (Estimated population 546,695)

> located near the bottom of the state of Wisconsin, large and rectangular in shape

> currently 260,157 votes for Biden (75.7%) and 78,789 votes for Trump (22.9%)

Milwaukee County (Estimated population 945,726)

> located at the bottom right of the state on the water

> currently 317,251 votes for Biden (69.4%) and 134,355 votes for Trump (29.4%)

Notice that the percentages of the total vote that the Democrats have received in Dane and Milwaukee counties exceed 65%, whereas most of these same percentages in all of the other blue counties in Wisconsin (in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count) are less than 55%.  The other blue counties whose percentages exceed 55% are counties with mostly small populations.  Three of these counties have percentages close to 55% and one of them whose percentage is 82.2% (Menominee County near the top right of the state) has a very small population.  I hypothesize that the reason for this discrepancy is that the Democrats are perpetrating vote fraud in Dane and Milwaukee counties in order to spread the vote fraud that they commit in Wisconsin out amongst two counties so that it is less noticeable and less likely to attract the suspicion of interested third parties.

Milwaukee County is completely surrounded by four counties in which the Republicans won the largest share of the votes, being Ozaukee County (55.4%), Washington County (68.4%), Waukesha County (59.8%) and Racine County (51.3%).  It is therefore highly suspicious that the Democrats achieved such a high percentage of the vote count in Milwaukee County of 69.4%.

Notice also that the percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received in Dane and Milwaukee counties, is much higher than the statewide percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received in Wisconsin, which is currently 49.6%.  This percentage is relatively close to the percentage of the total vote that Republicans have received in Wisconsin, which is currently 48.9%.  The reason that these two percentages are relatively close, is that the Democrats added just enough manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, to the count of legitimate votes in counties in Wisconsin, in order to eliminate the lead that the Republicans had over the Democrats in the vote count in Wisconsin and also to obtain a modest lead over the Republicans in the same vote count in Wisconsin.

From the high percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received in Dane and Milwaukee counties of 75.7% and 69.4% respectively, it is logical to hypothesize that a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, have been added to the count of legitimate votes in Dane and Milwaukee counties or a large number of legitimate votes that favored Trump have been removed from the count of legitimate votes in Dane and Milwaukee counties or both.

Any suspicious behavior of the poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers at the vote counting centers in Dane or Milwaukee counties is consistent with this obvious hypothesis.  This suspicious behavior may include:

> Strong reluctance to allow poll observers, particularly poll observers representing the Republican Party, into the voter counting center to observe the vote counting.

> Preventing poll observers, particularly poll observers who represent the Republican Party, who do manage to enter the vote counting center from signing out when they depart from the center, as an excuse for not allowing other poll observers, particularly poll observers who represent the Republican Party, from entering the vote counting center under any restrictions in place at the vote counting center on the number of people who may occupy the center at any given time, such as any restrictions relating to the current Coronavirus hoax.

> Not allowing poll observers to move close enough to the poll workers to be able to properly observe the vote counting.

> Blocking windows in the vote counting center in order to prevent poll observers from observing activity such as vote counting.

> Forcing poll observers, who have a legal right to attend the vote counting center in order to observe the activity in the center, to leave the center.

> Ignoring court orders presented by interested third parties which have been issued in order to provide those interested third parties with the legal right to take certain actions in relation to the vote counting center and the activity inside of it, such as entering the center to observe the activity in the center, such as the vote count.

> Harassment of interested third parties and poll watchers who have a legal right to attend the vote counting center.

Poll observers or interested third parties at a vote counting center for a county in Wisconsin, such as Dane or Milwaukee counties, in which manufactured, fraudulent ballots have been added to the count of legitimate votes in large numbers may expect to see or find:

> non-routine activity related to processing the manufactured, fraudulent ballots in order to ensure that they conform to the protocols that apply to legitimate ballots

> the removal of legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans in order to ensure that they are not counted in the course of the normal process of counting legitimate votes

> a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, which are deemed by poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers, to be legitimate ballots, all of which are marked to favor the Democrats, because they are manufactured, fraudulent ballots, so that an expected random number of legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans are not present amongst these fraudulent ballots

The obvious reason why representatives of the Trump campaign may have encountered such chaotic behaviour from poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers at the vote counting centers in Dane and Milwaukee counties in Wisconsin over the past few days is that large-scale vote fraud involving a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that have been marked to favor the Democrats, has been taking place in these vote counting centers during the vote counting for this presidential election as part of the large-scale vote fraud that Democrats have perpetrated in Wisconsin in order to eliminate Trump’s lead over Biden in the vote count in Wisconsin on the night of the election, Tuesday, November 3rd, and in order to obtain a modest lead over Trump in this same vote count.

The poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers are not concentrating exclusively on the relatively linear and orderly task of counting the legitimate ballots that have been cast by citizens in the state of Wisconsin in this election. They have the added complication of managing the manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that have been marked to favor the Democrats, and adding them to the count of legitimate votes in the correct quantities in order to achieve their objective of winning the final vote count in the state. They also have the added complication of removing legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans from the collection of uncounted legitimate ballots in order to achieve this same objective, as well as disposing of those legitimate ballots that have been removed without being detected.

This is a lot for poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers to be concentrating on. The perpetration by the Democrats of fraud in this election in the state of Wisconsin adds a lot of complexity to what is already a very demanding task of counting the votes. It is no wonder that poll observers and interested third parties who may have tried to obtain access to the vote counting centers in Dane and Milwaukee counties in Wisconsin over the past few days in order to observe the vote count and monitor the activity in those centers, may have encountered startlingly chaotic environments at those centers.

Vote fraud perpetrated by the Democrats in the state of Michigan during the 2020 United States Presidential Election…

By Andrew Mackinnon

Last updated: 12th November, 2020

When Michigan temporarily stopped counting the votes on the night of the 2020 United States Presidential Election, Tuesday, November 3rd, Trump was 294,623 votes ahead of Biden in Michigan with a 53% share of the vote (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).  At that time, Biden had a 45% share of the vote (accounting for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

Source:

President Donald Trump’s election night remarks, ABC News – News Ticker:

3 second mark

By Monday, November 9th, Trump’s lead in Michigan had been dramatically eliminated.  Furthermore, Trump was now trailing Biden by 146,123 votes so that Trump had just a 48% share of the vote (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

Source:

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

Michigan

Election night, Tuesday, November 3rd

Republican vote count and vc %  1,989,017  54.0%

Democratic vote count and vc %  1,694,394  46.0%

Monday, November 9th

Republican vote count and vc %  2,644,525  48.7%

Democratic vote count and vc %  2,790,648  51.3%

Difference, Election night to Present

Republican vote count and vc %  655,508  37.4%

Democratic vote count and vc %  1,096,254  62.6%

Sources of data:

President Donald Trump’s election night remarks, ABC News – News Ticker:

3 second mark                                                                    

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

Notes:

The vote counts above for Michigan on election night, Tuesday, November 3rd, have been obtained from their first appearance in the news ticker in the video above of President Donald Trump’s election night remarks at the 3 second mark.

“vc %” stands for “vote count percentage”

For the purpose of calculating the vote count percentages, vote counts for parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party have been ignored.

The only way that the Democrats could have made up Trump’s lead of 294,623 votes and establish their lead at the present time of 146,123 votes, is if they engaged in large-scale vote fraud involving hundreds of thousands of manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor the Democrats and added to the count of legitimate votes in counties in Michigan after the counting was temporarily stopped on the night of the election.

However, the Democrats had to do more than make up these 294,623 votes, as well as establish their lead at the present time of 146,123 votes.  The vote counting in all of the numerous counties in Michigan recommenced after election night and then continued on in the days after election night.  Therefore, the Democrats had to also make up the lead that Trump achieved within this counting in Michigan from the time that the vote counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time, assuming that the share of the vote that Trump achieved during this period, discounting the manufactured, fraudulent ballots that the Democrats had added to the count of legitimate votes, was the same as the share of the vote that Trump achieved by the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election, which was 53% (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

This means that the number of fraudulent ballots that the Democrats had to manufacture and add to the count of legitimate votes was equal to

294,623 + 146,123 + {655,508 – [(655,508 / 0.53) * 0.45]}

which equals

294,623 + 146,123 + 98,945 (rounded up to the nearest whole)

which equals

539,691

This calculation is based on the assumption that all legitimate votes for Trump that had not yet been counted at the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election were counted during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time and that they were not otherwise fraudulently set aside without being counted or fraudulently destroyed without being counted.

This calculation is also based on the assumption that no legitimate votes for Trump were fraudulently subtracted from the count of legitimate votes during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time after having already been previously counted, either before the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election or after the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election.

It is highly likely that the first assumption above is not valid and it is uncertain as to whether the second assumption above is not valid.  Therefore it is highly likely that the number of fraudulent ballots that the Democrats manufactured and added to the count of legitimate votes is less than the number calculated above of 539,691.

For every legitimate vote for Trump that had not yet been counted at the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election and that was fraudulently set aside without being counted or fraudulently destroyed without being counted during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time, the Democrats needed to add one less manufactured, fraudulent ballot that was marked to favor the Democrats to the count of legitimate votes.

For every legitimate vote for Trump that was fraudulently subtracted from the count of legitimate votes during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time after having already been previously counted, either before the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election or after the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election, the Democrats needed to add one less manufactured, fraudulent ballot that was marked to favor the Democrats to the count of legitimate votes.

In order to make up Trump’s lead over Biden on the night of the election of 294,623 votes and establish Biden’s lead over Trump at the present time of 146,123 votes, as well as make up Trump’s lead over Biden during the period of counting from the night of the election to the present time of 98,945 votes, the Democrats could have

added 539,691 (say 540,000) manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor Biden

or

destroyed 539,691 (say 540,000) legitimate votes that favored Trump

The problem with both of these two options is that they would have both greatly distorted the vote total for the relevant counties in which this fraud is perpetrated (ie. total number of votes cast in these counties) by increasing this total by 540,000 or reducing this total by 540,000, which would also distort the voter turnouts (percentages) for the relevant counties.  These distortions can attract suspicion from poll observers and interested third parties.

In fact, during the early morning of Wednesday, November 4th, following the day of the election of Tuesday, November 3rd, many people reported seeing the vote count total for the Democrats in Michigan suddenly increase by 138,339 votes while the vote count total for the Republicans in Michigan didn’t change at all.  There was zero change in the Republican vote count total while the Democrat vote count total increased by 138,339.  During the hours following the night of the election (when I was awake and watching the vote count develop, on account of being in a different time zone in Australia), I clearly remember being highly alarmed when I noticed that Trump’s lead in Michigan was no longer the 208,000 votes that I had recently sighted but had decreased dramatically to around 70,000 votes.

The mainstream media is trying to deny that this sudden increase of 138,339 in the Democrat vote count total for the state occurred, or it is trying to explain it away as votes that were added back in for the Democrats that had previously been subtracted from their vote count total in error.  However, nobody, including me, has any recollection of this supposed error in the Democrat vote count total that the mainstream media is trying to report as fact, because nobody saw the Democrat vote count total decrease by 138,339 votes.  Nobody is talking about that decrease because nobody saw that decrease because that decrease never happened.  It is a blatant lie that the mainstream media is trying to use to cover up this blatant act of fraud by the Democrats.  However, all of us noticed when the Democrat vote count total increased by 138,339 votes.  I noticed it and I was shocked.

If the Democrats added 270,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor Biden (ie. half of 540,000)

and

if the Democrats destroyed 270,000 legitimate votes that favored Trump (ie. half of 540,000)

then the vote totals for the relevant counties (ie. total number of votes cast in these counties) in which this fraud is perpetrated would remain unchanged and the voter turnouts (percentages) for the relevant counties would not be distorted.

Irrespective of whether the Democrats made up the votes they needed using 540,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, or half this number, being 270,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, the vote fraud that the Democrats have quite obviously perpetrated in the state of Michigan involves a massive number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats.

The most straightforward way for the Democrats to add such a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots in with the existing legitimate ballots in Michigan is to add them to the counts of legitimate votes in counties in Michigan with the largest populations where it is commonly assumed, based on past performance in previous elections, that the Democrat vote count will exceed the Republican vote count.  It is important that these counties have large populations, because there is a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots to be added to the counts of legitimate votes in these counties.  It would not be possible to add these manufactured, fraudulent ballots in many counties with smaller populations because the normal total number of votes cast is too small to accommodate a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots or even a significant portion of them.  Namely, the number of Republican votes is too low to be able to destroy the required number of legitimate Trump votes or the total number of Democrat votes is too small to be able to add the required number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, without pushing the Democrat vote total percentage too high and attracting suspicion.

Note that it is also possible to add manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the count of legitimate votes in counties in which the Republicans are leading in the vote count.  Due to my lack of experience and knowledge in this area of vote fraud, I cannot discount the possibility that this is occurring in Michigan.  However, I believe it is more likely that these manufactured, fraudulent ballots are being added to counties in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count.  The reason for this belief is that adding such ballots to counties in which the Republicans are leading in the vote count could directly cause the Democrats to become the leaders in the vote count in those counties.  Such an outcome would likely be inconsistent with the expectations of voting citizens in those counties, based on their knowledge of the voting intentions of their peers in those counties, and could therefore attract suspicion amongst citizens in those counties of the perpetration of vote fraud in those counties.

I cannot overstate that it is of critical importance to note that an inevitable result of adding manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, to the count of legitimate votes in any given county will always increase the percentage of total votes favoring the Democrats in that county.  Adding a larger number of these manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the count of legitimate votes in any given county will increase this percentage by an even larger amount in that county.

For this reason, counties in Michigan in which Democrats are leading in their counts of legitimate votes and in which manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, have been added to their counts of legitimate votes will tend to have higher percentages of the total number of votes favoring the Democrats than other counties in Michigan in which the Democrats are leading in their counts of legitimate votes and in which no manufactured, fraudulent ballots have been added to their counts of legitimate votes.

It is inevitable that the larger the number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, that are added to the count of legitimate votes in a county in which Democrats are leading in this count, the higher the percentage share of the total votes that the Democrats receive will be pushed up.  As the number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots that are added to the count of legitimate votes increases, the higher this percentage is pushed up and, as a direct consequence, the more suspicious observers of the vote count become about the integrity of the vote count having been compromised by vote fraud.

If you click on the map of Michigan on the following web page, you can see the counties in which the Democrats are leading, obviously in blue:

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

If you hover your mouse cursor over a county, the name of the county together with the current vote tallies for the county appear.

The large-scale vote fraud that has been perpetrated by the Democrats in Michigan involved manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats and that were added to the count of legitimate votes in blue counties with large populations and with what are now large Democrat leads in the vote count as a direct result of the addition of these fraudulent ballots.  These blue counties in Michigan in which the Democrats have committed large-scale vote fraud may include:

Wayne County (Estimated population 1,749,343)

> located in the far bottom right of the state on the water

> currently 587,074 votes for Biden (68.1%) and 264,149 votes for Trump (30.7%)

Washtenaw County (Estimated population 367,601)

> located directly west of Wayne County, which it adjoins

> currently 157,130 votes for Biden (72.7%) and 56,241 votes for Trump (26.0%)

Ingham County (Estimated population 292,406)

> located directly northwest of Washtenaw County

> currently 94,221 votes for Biden (65.2%) and 47,640 votes for Trump (33.0%)

Notice that the percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received in each of the counties listed above, Wayne, Washtenaw and Ingham, exceeds 65%, whereas these same percentages in all of the other blue counties in Michigan (in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count) are less than 55%, with only two exceptions, being Oakland County (56.4%), which is located north of Wayne County, which it adjoins, and Kalamazoo County (58.4%), which is located near the bottom left corner of the state.  I hypothesize that the reason for this discrepancy is that the Democrats are perpetrating vote fraud in all of these three counties listed above in order to spread the vote fraud that they commit in Michigan out amongst multiple counties so that it is less noticeable and less likely to attract the suspicion of interested third parties.

The high percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received in the three counties listed above, Wayne (68.1%), Washtenaw (72.7%) and Ingham (65.2%), is evidence of a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, having been added to the count of legitimate votes in these counties or a large number of legitimate votes that favored Trump having been removed from the count of legitimate votes in these counties or both.

Any suspicious behavior of the poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers at the vote counting centers in Wayne, Washtenaw and Ingham counties is consistent with this obvious hypothesis.  This suspicious behavior may include:

> Strong reluctance to allow poll observers, particularly poll observers representing the Republican Party, into the voter counting center to observe the vote counting.

> Preventing poll observers, particularly poll observers who represent the Republican Party, who do manage to enter the vote counting center from signing out when they depart from the center, as an excuse for not allowing other poll observers, particularly poll observers who represent the Republican Party, from entering the vote counting center under any restrictions in place at the vote counting center on the number of people who may occupy the center at any given time, such as any restrictions relating to the current Coronavirus hoax.

> Not allowing poll observers to move close enough to the poll workers to be able to properly observe the vote counting.

> Blocking windows in the vote counting center in order to prevent poll observers from observing activity such as vote counting.

> Forcing poll observers, who have a legal right to attend the vote counting center in order to observe the activity in the center, to leave the center.

> Ignoring court orders presented by interested third parties which have been issued in order to provide those interested third parties with the legal right to take certain actions in relation to the vote counting center and the activity inside of it, such as entering the center to observe the activity in the center, such as the vote count.

> Harassment of interested third parties and poll watchers who have a legal right to attend the vote counting center.

Poll observers or interested third parties at a vote counting center for a county in Michigan, such as Wayne, Washtenaw or Ingham counties, in which manufactured, fraudulent ballots have been added to the count of legitimate votes in large numbers may expect to see or find:

> non-routine activity related to processing the manufactured, fraudulent ballots in order to ensure that they conform to the protocols that apply to legitimate ballots

> the removal of legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans in order to ensure that they are not counted in the course of the normal process of counting legitimate votes

> a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, which are deemed by poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers, to be legitimate ballots, all of which are marked to favor the Democrats, because they are manufactured, fraudulent ballots, so that an expected random number of legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans are not present amongst these fraudulent ballots

The obvious reason why representatives of the Trump campaign may have encountered such chaotic behaviour from poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers at the vote counting centers in Wayne, Washtenaw and Ingham counties in Michigan over the past few days is that large-scale vote fraud involving a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that have been marked to favor the Democrats, has been taking place in these vote counting centers during the vote counting for this presidential election as part of the large-scale vote fraud that Democrats have perpetrated in Michigan in order to eliminate Trump’s lead over Biden in the vote count in Michigan on the night of the election, Tuesday, November 3rd, and in order to obtain a substantial lead over Trump in this same vote count.

The poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers at some vote counting centers are not concentrating exclusively on the relatively linear and orderly task of counting the legitimate ballots that have been cast by citizens in the state of Michigan in this election. They have the added complication of managing the manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that have been marked to favor the Democrats, and adding them to the count of legitimate votes in the correct quantities in order to achieve their objective of winning the final vote count in the state. They also have the added complication of removing legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans from the collection of uncounted legitimate ballots in order to achieve this same objective, as well as disposing of these legitimate ballots that have been removed without being detected.

This is a lot for poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers to be concentrating on. The perpetration by the Democrats of fraud in this election in the state of Michigan adds a lot of complexity to what is already a very demanding task.  It is no wonder that poll observers and interested third parties who may have tried to obtain access to the vote counting centers Wayne, Washtenaw and Ingham counties in Michigan over the past few days, in order to observe the vote count and monitor the activity in those centers, may have encountered startlingly chaotic environments at those centers.

Vote fraud perpetrated by the Democrats in the state of Georgia during the 2020 United States Presidential Election…

By Andrew Mackinnon

Last updated: 12th November, 2020

When Georgia temporarily stopped counting the votes on the night of the 2020 United States Presidential Election, Tuesday, November 3rd, Trump was 118,055 votes ahead of Biden in Georgia with a 51% share of the vote (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).  At that time, Biden had a 48% share of the vote (accounting for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

Source:

President Donald Trump’s election night remarks, ABC News – News Ticker:

49 second mark

By Monday, November 9th, Trump’s lead in Georgia had been dramatically eliminated.  Furthermore, Trump was now trailing Biden by 10,353 votes so that Trump had just a 49% share of the vote (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

Source:

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

Georgia

Election night, Tuesday, November 3rd

Republican vote count and vc %  2,367,062  51.3%

Democratic vote count and vc %  2,249,007  48.7%

Present, Monday, November 9th

Republican vote count and vc %  2,455,428  49.9%

Democratic vote count and vc %  2,465,781  50.1%

Difference, Election night to Present

Republican vote count and vc %  88,366  29.0%

Democratic vote count and vc %  216,774  71.0%

Sources of data:

President Donald Trump’s election night remarks, ABC News – News Ticker:

49 second mark                                                                  

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

Notes:

The vote counts above for Georgia on election night, Tuesday, November 3rd, have been obtained from their first appearance in the news ticker in the video above of President Donald Trump’s election night remarks at the 49 second mark.

“vc %” stands for “vote count percentage”

For the purpose of calculating the vote count percentages, vote counts for parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party have been ignored.

The only way that the Democrats could have made up Trump’s lead of 118,055 votes and establish their lead at the present time of 10,353 votes, is if they engaged in large-scale vote fraud involving tens of thousands of manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor the Democrats and added to the count of legitimate votes in counties in Georgia after the counting was temporarily stopped on the night of the election.

However, the Democrats had to do more than make up these 118,055 votes, as well as establish their lead at the present time of 10,353 votes.  The vote counting in all of the numerous counties in Georgia recommenced after election night and then continued on in the days after election night.  Therefore, the Democrats had to also make up the lead that Trump achieved within this counting in Georgia from the time that the vote counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time, assuming that the share of the vote that Trump achieved during this period, discounting the manufactured, fraudulent ballots that the Democrats had added to the count of legitimate votes, was the same as the share of the vote that Trump achieved by the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election, which was 51% (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

This means that the number of fraudulent ballots that the Democrats had to manufacture and add to the count of legitimate votes was equal to

118,055 + 10,353 + {88,366 – [(88,366 / 0.51) * 0.48]}

which equals

118,055 + 10,353 + 5,198

which equals

133,606

This calculation is based on the assumption that all legitimate votes for Trump that had not yet been counted at the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election were counted during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time and that they were not otherwise fraudulently set aside without being counted or fraudulently destroyed without being counted.

This calculation is also based on the assumption that no legitimate votes for Trump were fraudulently subtracted from the count of legitimate votes during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time after having already been previously counted, either before the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election or after the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election.

It is highly likely that the first assumption above is not valid and it is uncertain as to whether the second assumption above is not valid.  Therefore it is highly likely that the number of fraudulent ballots that the Democrats manufactured and added to the count of legitimate votes is less than the number calculated above of 133,606.

For every legitimate vote for Trump that had not yet been counted at the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election and that was fraudulently set aside without being counted or fraudulently destroyed without being counted during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time, the Democrats needed to add one less manufactured, fraudulent ballot that was marked to favor the Democrats to the count of legitimate votes.

For every legitimate vote for Trump that was fraudulently subtracted from the count of legitimate votes during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time after having already been previously counted, either before the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election or after the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election, the Democrats needed to add one less manufactured, fraudulent ballot that was marked to favor the Democrats to the count of legitimate votes.

In order to make up Trump’s lead over Biden on the night of the election of 118,055 votes and establish Biden’s lead over Trump at the present time of 10,353 votes, as well as make up Trump’s lead over Biden during the period of counting from the night of the election to the present time of 5,198 votes, the Democrats could have

added 133,606 (say 134,000) manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor Biden

or

destroyed 133,606 (say 134,000) legitimate votes that favored Trump

The problem with both of these two options is that they would have both distorted the vote total for the relevant counties in which this fraud is perpetrated (ie. total number of votes cast in these counties) by increasing this total by 134,000 or reducing this total by 134,000, which would also distort the voter turnouts (percentages) for the relevant counties.  These distortions can attract suspicion from poll observers and interested third parties.

If the Democrats added 67,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor Biden (ie. half of 134,000)

and

if the Democrats destroyed 67,000 legitimate votes that favored Trump (ie. half of 134,000)

then the vote totals for the relevant counties (ie. total number of votes cast in these counties) in which this fraud is perpetrated would remain unchanged and the voter turnouts (percentages) for the relevant counties would not be distorted.

Irrespective of whether the Democrats made up the votes they needed using 134,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, or half this number, being 67,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, the vote fraud that the Democrats have quite obviously perpetrated in the state of Georgia involves a significant number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats.

The most straightforward way for the Democrats to add such a significant number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots in with the existing legitimate ballots in Georgia is to add them to the counts of legitimate votes in counties in Georgia with the largest populations where it is commonly assumed, based on past performance in previous elections, that the Democrat vote count will exceed the Republican vote count.  It is important that these counties have large populations, because there is a significant number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots to be added to the counts of legitimate votes in these counties.  It would not be as straightforward to add these manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the counts of legitimate votes in many counties with smaller populations because the normal total number of votes cast is too small to accommodate a significant number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots or even a portion of them.  Namely, the number of Republican votes is too low to be able to destroy the required number of legitimate Trump votes or the total number of Democrat votes is too small to be able to add the required number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, without pushing the Democrat vote total percentage up too high and attracting suspicion.

Note that it is also possible to add manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the count of legitimate votes in counties in which the Republicans are leading in the vote count.  Due to my lack of experience and knowledge in this area of vote fraud, I cannot discount the possibility that this is occurring in Georgia.  However, I believe it is more likely that these manufactured, fraudulent ballots are being added to counties in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count.  The reason for this belief is that adding such ballots to counties in which the Republicans are leading in the vote count could directly cause the Democrats to become the leaders in the vote count in those counties.  Such an outcome would likely be inconsistent with the expectations of voting citizens in those counties, based on their knowledge of the voting intentions of their peers in those counties, and could therefore attract suspicion amongst citizens in those counties of the perpetration of vote fraud in those counties.

I cannot overstate that it is of critical importance to note that an inevitable result of adding manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, to the count of legitimate votes in any given county will always increase the percentage of total votes favoring the Democrats in that county.  Adding a larger number of these manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the count of legitimate votes in any given county will increase this percentage by an even larger amount in that county.

For this reason, counties in Georgia in which Democrats are leading in their counts of legitimate votes and in which manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, have been added to their counts of legitimate votes will tend to have higher percentages of the total number of votes favoring the Democrats than other counties in Georgia in which the Democrats are leading in their counts of legitimate votes and in which no manufactured, fraudulent ballots have been added to their counts of legitimate votes.

It is inevitable that the larger the number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, that are added to the count of legitimate votes in a county in which Democrats are leading in this count, the higher the percentage share of the total votes that the Democrats receive will be pushed up.  As the number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots that are added to the count of legitimate votes increases, the higher this percentage is pushed up and, as a direct consequence, the more suspicious observers of the vote count become about the integrity of the vote count having been compromised by vote fraud.

If you click on the map of Georgia on the following web page, you can see the counties in which the Democrats are leading, obviously in blue:

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

If you hover your mouse cursor over a county, the name of the county together with the current vote tallies for the county appear.

The extensive vote fraud that has been perpetrated by the Democrats in Georgia involved manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats and that were added to the count of legitimate votes in blue counties with large populations and with what are now large Democrat leads in the vote count as a direct result of the addition of these fraudulent ballots.  These blue counties in Georgia in which the Democrats have committed extensive vote fraud may include:

Fulton County (Estimated population 1,063,937)

> located at the top of the cluster of blue counties near the top left of the map of Georgia and also continuing on in the northwest of this cluster

> currently 377,484 votes for Biden (72.6%) and 136,140 votes for Trump (26.2%)

DeKalb County (Estimated population 759,297)

> located in the center of the cluster of blue counties near the top left of the map of Georgia and south of Fulton County which adjoins it

> currently 305,197 votes for Biden (83.1%) and 57,993 votes for Trump (15.8%)

Clayton County (Estimated population 292,256)

> located at the bottom left of the cluster of blue counties near the top left of the map of Georgia and southwest of DeKalb County which adjoins it

> currently 94,365 votes for Biden (85.0%) and 15,671 votes for Trump (14.1%)

Notice that the percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received in each of the counties listed above, Fulton, DeKalb and Clayton, exceeds 70%, whereas these same percentages in all of the other blue counties in Georgia (in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count) are less than 70%, with the exception of just four counties which all have very small total vote counts.  I hypothesize that the reason for this discrepancy is that the Democrats are perpetrating vote fraud in all of these three counties in order to spread the vote fraud that they commit in Georgia out amongst multiple counties so that it is less noticeable and less likely to attract the suspicion of interested third parties.

What is absolutely certain, beyond any doubt whatsoever, is that the Democrats are committing vote fraud in DeKalb County where the percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received is a sky-high 83.1%.  This is evidence of a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, having been added to the count of legitimate votes in DeKalb County or a large number of legitimate votes that favored Trump, having been removed from the count of legitimate votes in DeKalb County or both.

Notice also that the percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received in each of the counties listed above, is much higher than the statewide percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received in Georgia, which is currently 49.5%.  This percentage is virtually the same percentage of the total vote that Republicans have received in Georgia, which is currently 49.3%.  The reason that these two percentages are so close, is that the Democrats added just enough manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, to the count of legitimate votes in counties in Georgia, in order to eliminate the lead that the Republicans had over the Democrats in the vote count in Georgia and also to obtain a modest lead over the Republicans in the same vote count in Georgia.

Notice also that the other blue counties in Georgia (in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count) overwhelmingly have low total vote counts which are indicative of low populations (with just a few exceptions in the cluster of blue counties near the top left of the map of Georgia).

From the high percentage of the total vote that Democrats have received in DeKalb County of 83.1%, it is logical to hypothesize that a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, have been added to the count of legitimate votes in DeKalb County or a large number of legitimate votes that favored Trump have been removed from the count of legitimate votes in DeKalb County or both.

Any suspicious behavior of the poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers at the vote counting centers in Fulton, DeKalb or Clayton counties is consistent with this obvious hypothesis.  This suspicious behavior may include:

> Strong reluctance to allow poll observers, particularly poll observers representing the Republican Party, into the voter counting center to observe the vote counting.

> Preventing poll observers, particularly poll observers who represent the Republican Party, who do manage to enter the vote counting center from signing out when they depart from the center, as an excuse for not allowing other poll observers, particularly poll observers who represent the Republican Party, from entering the vote counting center under any restrictions in place at the vote counting center on the number of people who may occupy the center at any given time, such as any restrictions relating to the current Coronavirus hoax.

> Not allowing poll observers to move close enough to the poll workers to be able to properly observe the vote counting.

> Blocking windows in the vote counting center in order to prevent poll observers from observing activity such as vote counting.

> Forcing poll observers, who have a legal right to attend the vote counting center in order to observe the activity in the center, to leave the center.

> Ignoring court orders presented by interested third parties which have been issued in order to provide those interested third parties with the legal right to take certain actions in relation to the vote counting center and the activity inside of it, such as entering the center to observe the activity in the center, such as the vote count.

> Harassment of interested third parties and poll watchers who have a legal right to attend the vote counting center.

Poll observers or interested third parties at a vote counting center for a county in Georgia, such as Fulton, DeKalb or Clayton counties, in which manufactured, fraudulent ballots have been added to the count of legitimate votes in large numbers may expect to see or find:

> non-routine activity related to processing the manufactured, fraudulent ballots in order to ensure that they conform to the protocols that apply to legitimate ballots

> the removal of legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans in order to ensure that they are not counted in the course of the normal process of counting legitimate votes

> a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, which are deemed by poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers, to be legitimate ballots, all of which are marked to favor the Democrats, because they are manufactured, fraudulent ballots, so that an expected random number of legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans are not present amongst these fraudulent ballots

The obvious reason why representatives of the Trump campaign may have encountered such chaotic behaviour from poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers at the vote counting centers in Fulton, DeKalb and Clayton counties in Georgia over the past few days is that large-scale vote fraud involving a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that have been marked to favor the Democrats, has been taking place in these vote counting centers during the vote counting for this presidential election as part of the large-scale vote fraud that Democrats have perpetrated in Georgia in order to eliminate Trump’s lead over Biden in the vote count in Georgia on the night of the election, Tuesday, November 3rd, and in order to obtain a modest lead over Trump in this same vote count.

The poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers are not concentrating exclusively on the relatively linear and orderly task of counting the legitimate ballots that have been cast by citizens in the state of Georgia in this election. They have the added complication of managing the manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that have been marked to favor the Democrats, and adding them to the count of legitimate votes in the correct quantities in order to achieve their objective of winning the final vote count in the state. They also have the added complication of removing legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans from the collection of uncounted legitimate ballots in order to achieve this same objective, as well as disposing of these legitimate ballots that have been removed without being detected.

This is a lot for poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers to be concentrating on. The perpetration by the Democrats of fraud in this election in the state of Georgia adds a lot of complexity to what is already a very demanding task. It is no wonder that poll observers and interested third parties who may have tried to obtain access to the vote counting centers in Fulton, DeKalb and Clayton counties in Georgia over the past few days in order to observe the vote count and monitor the activity in those centers, may have encountered startlingly chaotic environments at those centers.

Vote fraud perpetrated by the Democrats in the state of Pennsylvania during the 2020 United States Presidential Election…

By Andrew Mackinnon

Last updated: 12th November, 2020

When Pennsylvania temporarily stopped counting the votes on the night of the 2020 United States Presidential Election, Tuesday, November 3rd, Trump was 696,580 votes ahead of Biden in Pennsylvania with a 56% share of the vote (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).  At that time, Biden had a 43% share of the vote (accounting for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

Source:

President Donald Trump’s election night remarks, ABC News – News Ticker:

20 second mark

By Monday, November 9th, Trump’s lead in Pennsylvania had been dramatically eliminated.  Furthermore, Trump was now trailing Biden by 45,727 votes so that Trump had just a 49% share of the vote (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

Source:

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

Pennsylvania

Election night, Tuesday, November 3rd

Republican vote count and vc %  2,869,907  56.9%

Democratic vote count and vc %  2,173,327  43.1%

Present, Monday, November 9th

Republican vote count and vc %  3,316,291  49.7%

Democratic vote count and vc %  3,362,018  50.3%

Difference, Election night to Present

Republican vote count and vc %  446,384  27.3%

Democratic vote count and vc %  1,188,691  72.7%

Sources of data:

President Donald Trump’s election night remarks, ABC News – News Ticker:

20 second mark                                                                  

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

Notes:

The vote counts above for Pennsylvania on election night, Tuesday, November 3rd, have been obtained from their first appearance in the news ticker in the video above of President Donald Trump’s election night remarks at the 20 second mark.

“vc %” stands for “vote count percentage”

For the purpose of calculating the vote count percentages, vote counts for parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party have been ignored.

The only way that the Democrats could have made up Trump’s lead of 696,580 votes and establish their lead at the present time of 45,727 votes, is if they engaged in large-scale vote fraud involving hundreds of thousands of manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor the Democrats and added to the count of legitimate votes in counties in Pennsylvania after the counting was temporarily stopped on the night of the election.

However, the Democrats had to do more than make up these 696,580 votes, as well as establish their lead at the present time of 45,727 votes.  The vote counting in all of the numerous counties in Pennsylvania recommenced after election night and then continued on in the days after election night.  Therefore, the Democrats had to also make up the lead that Trump achieved within this counting in Pennsylvania from the time that the vote counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time, assuming that the share of the vote that Trump achieved during this period, discounting the manufactured, fraudulent ballots that the Democrats had added to the count of legitimate votes, was the same as the share of the vote that Trump achieved by the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election, which was 56% (accounting for votes for all parties, including parties other than the Republican Party and the Democratic Party).

This means that the number of fraudulent ballots that the Democrats had to manufacture and add to the count of legitimate votes was equal to

696,580 + 45,727 + {446,384 – [(446,384 / 0.56) * 0.43]}

which equals

696,580 + 45,727 + 103,625 (rounded up to the nearest whole)

which equals

845,932

This calculation is based on the assumption that all legitimate votes for Trump that had not yet been counted at the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election were counted during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time and that they were not otherwise fraudulently set aside without being counted or fraudulently destroyed without being counted.

This calculation is also based on the assumption that no legitimate votes for Trump were fraudulently subtracted from the count of legitimate votes during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time after having already been previously counted, either before the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election or after the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election.

It is highly likely that the first assumption above is not valid and it is uncertain as to whether the second assumption above is not valid.  Therefore it is highly likely that the number of fraudulent ballots that the Democrats manufactured and added to the count of legitimate votes is less than the number calculated above of 845,932.

For every legitimate vote for Trump that had not yet been counted at the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election and that was fraudulently set aside without being counted or fraudulently destroyed without being counted during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time, the Democrats needed to add one less manufactured, fraudulent ballot that was marked to favor the Democrats to the count of legitimate votes.

For every legitimate vote for Trump that was fraudulently subtracted from the count of legitimate votes during the period from the time the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election to the present time after having already been previously counted, either before the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election or after the counting temporarily stopped on the night of the election, the Democrats needed to add one less manufactured, fraudulent ballot that was marked to favor the Democrats to the count of legitimate votes.

In order to make up Trump’s lead over Biden on the night of the election of 696,580 votes and establish Biden’s lead over Trump at the present time of 45,727 votes, as well as make up Trump’s lead over Biden during the period of counting from the night of the election to the present time of 103,625 votes, the Democrats could have

added 845,932 (say 850,000) manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor Biden

or

destroyed 845,932 (say 850,000) legitimate votes that favored Trump

The problem with both of these two options is that they would have both greatly distorted the vote total for the relevant counties in which this fraud is perpetrated (ie. total number of votes cast in these counties) by increasing this total by 850,000 or reducing this total by 850,000, which would also distort the voter turnouts (percentages) for the relevant counties.  These distortions can attract suspicion from poll observers and interested third parties.

If the Democrats added 425,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots that were marked to favor Biden (ie. half of 850,000)

and

if the Democrats destroyed 425,000 legitimate votes that favored Trump (ie. half of 850,000)

then the vote totals for the relevant counties (ie. total number of votes cast in these counties) in which this fraud is perpetrated would remain unchanged and the voter turnouts (percentages) for the relevant counties would not be distorted.

Irrespective of whether the Democrats made up the votes they needed using 850,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, or half this number, being 425,000 manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, the vote fraud that the Democrats have quite obviously perpetrated in the state of Pennsylvania involves a massive number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats.

The most straightforward way for the Democrats to add such a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots in with the existing legitimate ballots in Pennsylvania is to add them to the count of legitimate votes in counties in Pennsylvania with the largest populations where it is commonly assumed, based on past performance in previous elections, that the Democrat vote count will exceed the Republican vote count.  It is important that these counties have large populations, because there is a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots to be added to the counts of legitimate votes in these counties.  It would not be possible to add these manufactured, fraudulent ballots in many counties with smaller populations because the normal total number of votes cast is too small to accommodate a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots or even a significant portion of them.  Namely, the number of Republican votes is too low to be able to destroy the required number of legitimate Trump votes or the total number of Democrat votes is too small to be able to add the required number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, without pushing the Democrat vote total percentage too high and attracting suspicion.

Note that it is also possible to add manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the count of legitimate votes in counties in which the Republicans are leading in the vote count.  Due to my lack of experience and knowledge in this area of vote fraud, I cannot discount the possibility that this is occurring in Pennsylvania.  However, I believe it is more likely that these manufactured, fraudulent ballots are being added to counties in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count.  The reason for this belief is that adding such ballots to counties in which the Republicans are leading in the vote count could directly cause the Democrats to become the leaders in the vote count in those counties.  Such an outcome would likely be inconsistent with the expectations of voting citizens in those counties, based on their knowledge of the voting intentions of their peers in those counties, and could therefore attract suspicion amongst citizens in those counties of the perpetration of vote fraud in those counties.

I cannot overstate that it is of critical importance to note that an inevitable result of adding manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, to the count of legitimate votes in any given county will always increase the percentage of total votes favoring the Democrats in that county.  Adding a larger number of these manufactured, fraudulent ballots to the count of legitimate votes in any given county will increase this percentage by an even larger amount in that county.

For this reason, counties in Pennsylvania in which Democrats are leading in their counts of legitimate votes and in which manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, have been added to their counts of legitimate votes will tend to have higher percentages of the total number of votes favoring the Democrats than other counties in Pennsylvania in which the Democrats are leading in their counts of legitimate votes and in which no manufactured, fraudulent ballots have been added to their counts of legitimate votes.

It is inevitable that the larger the number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that are marked to favor the Democrats, that are added to the count of legitimate votes in a county in which Democrats are leading in this count, the higher the percentage share of the total votes that the Democrats receive will be pushed up.  As the number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots that are added to the count of legitimate votes increases, the higher this percentage is pushed up and, as a direct consequence, the more suspicious observers of the vote count become about the integrity of the vote count having been compromised by vote fraud.

If you click on the map of Pennsylvania on the following web page, you can see the counties in which the Democrats are leading, obviously in blue:

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results

If you hover your mouse cursor over a county, the name of the county together with the current vote tallies for the county appear.

The large-scale vote fraud that has been perpetrated by the Democrats in Pennsylvania involved manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats and that were added to the count of legitimate votes in blue counties with large populations and with what are now large Democrat leads in the vote count as a direct result of the addition of these fraudulent ballots.  These blue counties in Pennsylvania in which the Democrats have committed large-scale vote fraud may include:

Philadelphia County (Estimated population 1,584,064)

> geographically tiny but highly-populated and located in the far bottom right corner of the state

> currently 555,833 votes for Biden (81.0%) and 125,897 votes for Trump (18.3%)

Montgomery County (Estimated population 830,915)

> located directly northwest of Philadelphia County, which it adjoins

> currently 313,543 votes for Biden (62.5%) and 182,907 votes for Trump (36.5%)

Delaware County (Estimated population 566,747)

> located directly west of Philadelphia County, which it adjoins

> currently 200,911 votes for Biden (62.8%) and 116,216 votes for Trump (36.3%)

Chester County (Estimated population 524,989)

> located directly northwest of Delaware County, which it adjoins

> currently 179,065 votes for Biden (57.9%) and 126,844 votes for Trump (41.0%) 

Allegheny County (Estimated population 1,216,045)

> located near the bottom left corner of Pennsylvania

> currently 410,553 votes for Biden (59.4%) and 272,135 votes for Trump (39.4%)

Notice that the percentage of the total vote count that Democrats have received in each of the counties listed above, Philadelphia, Montgomery, Delaware, Chester and Allegheny, exceeds 55%, whereas these same percentages in all of the other blue counties in Pennsylvania (in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count) are less than 55%.  I hypothesize that the reason for this discrepancy is that the Democrats are perpetrating vote fraud in all of these five counties in order to spread the vote fraud that they commit in Pennsylvania out amongst multiple counties so that it is less noticeable and less likely to attract the suspicion of interested third parties.

What is absolutely certain, beyond any doubt whatsoever, is that the Democrats are committing vote fraud in Philadelphia County where the percentage of the total vote count that Democrats have received is a sky-high 81.0%.  This is evidence of a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, having been added to the count of legitimate votes in Philadelphia County or a large number of legitimate votes that favored Trump, having been removed from the count of legitimate votes in Philadelphia County or both.

Notice also that the percentage of the total vote count that Democrats have received in each of the counties listed above, is much higher than the statewide percentage of the total vote count that Democrats have received in Pennsylvania, which is currently 49.6%.  This percentage is virtually the same percentage of the total vote count that Republicans have received in Pennsylvania, which is currently 49.2%.  The reason that these two percentages are so close, is that the Democrats added just enough manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, to the count of legitimate votes in counties in Pennsylvania, in order to eliminate the lead that the Republicans had over the Democrats in the vote count in Pennsylvania and also to obtain a modest lead over the Republicans in the same vote count in Pennsylvania.

Notice also that the other blue counties in Pennsylvania (in which the Democrats are leading in the vote count) overwhelmingly have low total vote counts which are indicative of low populations (with the exception of Bucks County, to the northeast of Philadelphia county, in the bottom right of Pennsylvania).

From the high percentage of the total vote count that Democrats have received in Philadelphia County of 81.0%, it is logical to hypothesize that a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that were marked to favor the Democrats, have been added to the count of legitimate votes in Philadelphia County or a large number of legitimate votes that favored Trump have been removed from the count of legitimate votes in Philadelphia County or both.

The suspicious behavior of the poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers at the vote counting center in Philadelphia County is consistent with this obvious hypothesis.  This suspicious behavior may include:

> Strong reluctance to allow poll observers, particularly poll observers representing the Republican Party, into the voter counting center to observe the vote counting.

> Preventing poll observers, particularly poll observers who represent the Republican Party, who do manage to enter the vote counting center from signing out when they depart from the center, as an excuse for not allowing other poll observers, particularly poll observers who represent the Republican Party, from entering the vote counting center under any restrictions in place at the vote counting center on the number of people who may occupy the center at any given time, such as any restrictions relating to the current Coronavirus hoax.

> Not allowing poll observers to move close enough to the poll workers to be able to properly observe the vote counting.

> Blocking windows in the vote counting center in order to prevent poll observers from observing activity such as vote counting.

> Forcing poll observers, who have a legal right to attend the vote counting center in order to observe the activity in the center, to leave the center.

> Ignoring court orders presented by interested third parties which have been issued in order to provide those interested third parties with the legal right to take certain actions in relation to the vote counting center and the activity inside of it, such as entering the center to observe the activity in the center, such as the vote count.

> Harassment of interested third parties and poll watchers who have a legal right to attend the vote counting center.

Poll observers or interested third parties at a vote counting center for a county in Pennsylvania, such as Philadelphia County, in which manufactured, fraudulent ballots have been added to the count of legitimate votes in large numbers may expect to see or find:

> non-routine activity related to processing the manufactured, fraudulent ballots in order to ensure that they conform to the protocols that apply to legitimate ballots

> the removal of legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans in order to ensure that they are not counted in the course of the normal process of counting legitimate votes

> a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, which are deemed by poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers, to be legitimate ballots, all of which are marked to favor the Democrats, because they are manufactured, fraudulent ballots, so that an expected random number of legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans are not present amongst these fraudulent ballots

The obvious reason why representatives of the Trump campaign encountered such chaotic behaviour from poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers at the vote counting center in Philadelphia County in Pennsylvania over the past few days is that large-scale vote fraud involving a large number of manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that have been marked to favor the Democrats, has been taking place in this vote counting center during the vote counting for this presidential election as part of the large-scale vote fraud that Democrats have perpetrated in Pennsylvania in order to eliminate Trump’s lead over Biden in the vote count in Pennsylvania on the night of the election, Tuesday, November 3rd, and in order to obtain a significant lead over Trump in this same vote count.

The poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers are not concentrating exclusively on the relatively linear and orderly task of counting the legitimate ballots that have been cast by citizens in the state of Pennsylvania in this election. They have the added complication of managing the manufactured, fraudulent ballots, that have been marked to favor the Democrats, and adding them to the count of legitimate votes in the correct quantities in order to achieve their objective of winning the final vote count in the state. They also have the added complication of removing legitimate ballots that favor the Republicans from the collection of uncounted legitimate ballots in order to achieve this same objective, as well as disposing of these legitimate ballots that have been removed without being detected.

This is a lot for poll officials, poll supervisors and poll workers to be concentrating on. The perpetration by the Democrats of fraud in this election in the state of Pennsylvania adds a lot of complexity to what is already a very demanding task. It is no wonder that poll observers and interested third parties who have tried to obtain access to the vote counting center in Philadelphia over the past few days, in order to observe the vote count and monitor the activity in the center, have encountered a startlingly chaotic environment at that center.

Donald Trump is as fake as the Coronavirus…

By Andrew Mackinnon

Donald Trump is pretending to represent the interests of American citizens who are opposed to the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan without being opposed to it himself. This is called “controlled opposition”. His secret allegiance is to the synagogue of Satan.

Donald Trump has tested positive for COVID-19, which is an alleged virus that doesn’t actually exist. It is a fraudulent diagnostic test that registers positive in response to any number of diseases or health problems that cause the cells in the human body to produce exosomes as an immune response. When this diagnostic test detects the presence of exosomes in the human body of the test subject, it fraudulently comes to the conclusion that the test subject has the non-existent virus named COVID-19.

In the aftermath of millions of people in the western world coming to this conclusion that COVID-19 is a fraud, Donald Trump has tested positive in order to promote the lie that COVID-19 is a legitimate disease and a threat to us all.

In recent weeks, millions of people in the western world have come to the conclusion that COVID-19 is a fraud, to the extent that governments around the world and the mainstream media around the world are having an increasingly difficult time convincing people that COVID-19 is a legitimate threat instead of something that has been concocted to control the citizenry. As the credibility of those promoting the COVID-19 fraud steadily sinks, lo and behold, along comes Donald Trump to bolster their credibility by testing positive himself.

I fully support the millions of people who Donald Trump pretends to represent who are opposed to the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan but I don’t support him beyond hoping that he is elected president in the next election instead of Democrat Joe Biden. Comparing Donald Trump and Joe Biden, Donald Trump is the lesser of two literal evils.

Australia needs to manufacture motor vehicles…

By Andrew Mackinnon

Australia needs to have its own manufacturer of motor vehicles again, now that it no longer manufactures any motor vehicles in the country.  Japan hosts car manufacturing, similarly South Korea, the United States of America, Germany, France, China, Russia and the United Kingdom.  Multiple African countries also host car manufacturing – Algeria, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tunisia and Uganda.

Car manufacturing is right up near the apex of manufacturing, which is probably occupied by aircraft manufacturers.  Innovative Australian minds need something to apply their skills to.  It wouldn’t be difficult at all to build a superlative range of motor vehicles in Australia because the overwhelming majority of vehicles manufactured around the world today are poorly designed. Front-wheel drive vehicles are an engineering abomination that account for at least 60% of all motor vehicles manufactured worldwide today.  Toyota makes cars that are so ridiculously curvy that at least 20% of the potential cargo space in their vehicles is eviscerated.  Mercedez-Benz vehicles have an absurd number of unnecessary, complicated electronic systems that make them very difficult and very expensive to maintain.

I suggest an Australian car manufacturer named “Boxcar”.  Its point of difference would be the boxy design of its vehicles which maximizes their cargo space.  Instead of wildly curved sides that intrude upon potential cargo space, its sides would be mostly vertical, including its rear.  It costs a lot of money to acquire and run a motor vehicle, so it makes logical sense that its cargo space should be as large as possible to enable the vehicle to carry as much as possible.  Why would anybody want to spend all that money on their car, only to find that they can’t fit a fridge in the back?

It would be ideal for Boxcar vehicles to be made of aluminium, in order to resist corrosion and minimise weight (thus maximising their power to weight ratios), but I defer to the experts on the need for steel in the structural parts of the chassis.

Boxcar vehicles would be rear-wheel drive or four-wheel drive or all-wheel drive.  Engines would only be mounted with their crankshafts parallel to the sides of the vehicles, unlike many ghastly front-wheel drive vehicles today.

Rear-wheel drive or four-wheel drive or all-wheel drive vehicles with their engines mounted in this way are easier to maintain than front-wheel drive vehicles because the timing belt is accessible at the front of the engine bay and is therefore easier to replace. Replacement of the timing belt at the required service interval is critically important for many vehicles. Failure to replace the timing belt at the required service interval can lead to engine failure, necessitating the replacement of the engine.

There is one very important reason why front-wheel drive vehicles became the standard to be followed in the middle of the 1980s, so that the majority of passenger vehicles produced today are front-wheel drive. Front-wheel drive vehicles are more difficult to work on, making it more difficult for vehicle owners to perform their own maintenance and repairs, which would save them many thousands of dollars in the medium to long term on maintenance and repairs.

The engines that would power Boxcar vehicles would ideally be diesel engines, both reducing the risk of fire in an accident (since diesel fuel is not easily ignited) and allowing them to run on recycled cooking oil.

The transmission of the Boxcar vehicles, whether manual or automatic, should not be bolted on to the rear of the engine, but should instead be positioned just in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle. The differential would bolt on to the rear of the transmission and would drive the two rear axles (ie. constant velocity joints) that drive the rear wheels.

For vehicles with manual transmissions, the clutch would attach to the fly wheel at the rear of the crankshaft of the engine in the normal way. It would be covered by a bell housing. A propeller shaft would transmit rotational power from the engine at the front of the vehicle to the manual transmission near the rear of the vehicle. Vehicles with automatic transmissions would have a similar kind of layout except that the clutch is absent.

There are two very important advantages to positioning the transmission, whether manual or automatic, in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle.

Firstly, the weight distribution of the vehicle is dramatically improved. Instead of most of the weight of the vehicle being in the front half of the vehicle, predominated by the engine and transmission, weight is more evenly distributed between the front and rear of the vehicle. It is common knowledge that many rear-wheel drive vehicles whose transmissions are bolted on to the rear of the engine suffer from a lack of traction at the rear wheels and deficient handling as a result of a lack of weight at the rear of the vehicle.

Secondly, it is much easier to change the clutch on a vehicle whose manual transmission is positioned in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle than on a vehicle whose manual transmission is bolted on to the rear of engine. This is because one only has to remove the lightweight bell housing from the rear of the engine, after first removing the propeller shaft, in order to change the clutch on a vehicle whose manual transmission is positioned in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle. There is no need to remove and replace the very heavy manual transmission.

A good example of a vehicle whose transmission is positioned in front of the rear wheels near the rear of the vehicle is the Volvo 360, which was manufactured by Volvo from 1976 to 1991.

The rear suspension of Boxcar vehicles should be so over-engineered that the rear axles never break no matter what conditions and stresses they’re subjected to.

To open the rear hatch of any vehicle and find that there is a lip, being a difference in height between the bottom of the hatch when closed and the level of the cargo space in the rear of the vehicle, is asinine. The bottom of the rear door or doors of the vehicles that Boxcar would produce (such as two barn doors of equal size) should be at the same height as the level of the cargo space in the rear of the vehicle, so that items can be easily moved into and out of this cargo space.

Most motor vehicle manufacturers around the world today design their vehicles to wear out prematurely so that the owners will be forced to buy overpriced spare parts in order to maintain and repair them. Boxcar could earn itself a stellar reputation by designing its vehicles to last as long as possible, thus winning over the hearts and minds of people who have long since abandoned car ownership to shield themselves from this chicanery which has been going on for decades.

It is a national embarrassment that the most popular vehicles in Australia, the Toyota Corolla, the Toyota Camry, the Toyota Hilux and the Toyota Landcruiser, are all designed and manufactured many thousands of kilometres away in Japan.

I look forward to the day when the most popular vehicles in Australia are designed and built in Australia by Boxcar.

Modern-day Jews are Edomites

By Andrew Mackinnon

The people around the world calling themselves “Jews” are descendants of Esau, the son of Isaac who forfeited the blessing of God to his younger brother, Jacob. Descendants of Esau are known as “Edomites” in the Old Testament (Genesis 36:43).

The word “Jew” in the Bible has been mistranslated. In the Old Testament, it is a Hebrew word that means “Judahite” (ie. member of the tribe of Judah). In the New Testament, it is a Greek word that means “Judean” (ie. somebody who lives in Judea). I looked this up in Strong’s Concordance and it checks out.

The Jewish Pharisees told Jesus Christ that they were descended from Abraham, Isaac’s father, and that they had never been in slavery to anybody (John 8:33, 37). This is because the Jewish Pharisees were descended from Esau who married Canaanite women against God’s command and lived in Mount Seir (Genesis 36:2, 8) while Jacob’s descendants, the Israelites, settled in Egypt and were later put into slavery there.

Modern-day Jews are descendants of Esau. Their ancestors lived in Khazaria after the time of Christ, before spreading out all over the world where they’re found today. Their religious text is the Talmud which is vehemently anti-Christian. It has nothing to do with the Old Testament. Modern-day Jews have the spirit of the anti-Christ and hate white Christians passionately. They’re Satanists masquerading as “God’s chosen people”.

Jesus Christ referred to these descendants of Esau, these Edomites, who are pretending to be God’s chosen people, as “the synagogue of Satan” in Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9.

“I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”

Revelation 2:9, King James Version of the Bible

“Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”

Revelation 3:9, King James Version of the Bible

If modern-day Jews are not descendants of Jacob and are not therefore descendants of the Israelites, then who on this earth today are descendants of the Israelites? White people are descendants of Jacob and the Israelites.  They live in the United Kingdom, Europe (eg. Germany, France, Sweden, Norway, Finland), Canada, the United States of America, Australia and New Zealand, among other places on earth.

Jesus Christ told the Jewish Pharisees that they were liars and of their father the Devil. What do we see today? Modern-day Jews claim to be the chosen people of God while railing against Christians and blaspheming Jesus Christ.  In fact, modern-day Jews are most vehemently opposed to white Christians in western countries because white people in western countries are descendants of the Israelites, unlike modern-day Jews who know that their claim to be descendants of the Israelites is a lie.

Modern-day Jews run the banking system in western countries, the media, the education system and the Christian churches, among other things. They have single-handedly derailed the entire western world in the space of the last 60 years, principally by charging interest on money created out of nothing when the banks lend and by dramatically increasing immigration into western countries from China, India and Muslim countries in the Middle East (but not before invading several of those countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria under false pretences). Other means by which they are seeking to literally kill off white people by making their lives prohibitively difficult are:

> inflating house prices to make it more difficult for white people to get married, buy a house and start a family.

> loading school students up with homework to do each afternoon after school so that many school students in secondary school in their teenage years spend more time each week working at school and at home doing their homework than many adults working full-time. Some bright school students got it right in recent years. Homework is slavery – preparation for a life of slavery and drudgery paying interest on debt to banks owned and run by Jews, who create money out of nothing when they lend and then charge interest on it.

> property taxes in the United States of America, whereby home owners are forced every year to pay thousands of dollars in property taxes to their local government.

> progressive income taxation, whereby people working harder and earning more in income each year pay a higher percentage of their income in income taxation, which is a moral obscenity.

Everything that modern-day Jews do is based on lies and deception. This has gone on long enough.

There are people who are currently seeking to discredit the truth of the identity of modern-day Jews as satanic imposters and the truth of the identity of white people as descendants of the Israelites by adding errors to this truth. The first of these errors that they’re promoting is that only white people are descended from Adam and Eve and that all other races are not even human but are animals.  (This error is a carbon-copy of the teaching of the repulsive Jewish Talmud, which claims that only Jewish people are human and that all other races are animals.) The Bible contradicts and discredits this error:

“And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;”

Acts 17:26, The New Testament, King James Version of the Bible

All people on the earth today are descendants of Adam and Eve.

The second of these errors that they’re promoting is that only white people can be saved through faith in Jesus Christ. However, salvation is available to all people, irrespective of their race, through faith in Jesus Christ.

I believe that the reason these virulent errors are being promoted is to paint white Christians who realise their identity as descendants of the Israelites as “white supremacists” in order to turn other races against them.

The alleged coronavirus, named COVID-19, does not exist.

By Andrew Mackinnon

The information in this post has been compiled from the work of Dr Andrew Kaufman published in the following video:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/U2xM8ZJ0Xmdx/

Dr Andrew Kaufman, M.D. has the following qualifications and background:

  • Licensed and Board Certified in Psychiatry and Forensic Psychiatry
  • Former Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • Former Medical Instructor of Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina
  • Psychiatry Residency, Duke University
  • Doctor of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina
  • Bachelors of Science in Biology, MIT

The actual definition of coronaviruses is a group of related RNA (ribonucleic acid) viruses that cause diseases in human beings, mammals and birds.  These viruses cause respiratory tract infections in people that can range from mild (eg. the common cold) to lethal.

It is alleged by the perpetrators of the so-called Coronavirus hoax that COVID-19 belongs to this group of related RNA viruses known as coronaviruses.

However, the diagnostic test for COVID-19 does not detect a virus at all but instead detects the presence of exosomes in the human body and diagnoses a subject of the test as having COVID-19 if these exosomes are present.

When the human body exhibits an immune response to an illness within it or an attack against it, such as the common cold, the flu, stress or exposure to excess microwave energy (electromagnetic radiation), cells in the human body release what are called “exosomes”.

Here is a more complete list of things that can induce the production of exosomes in cells in the human body:

  • Diseases
  • Infection
  • Asthma
  • Cancer
  • Injury
  • Stress
  • Toxic substances
  • Ionising radiation
  • Electromagnetic radiation

From the 23 minute 40 second mark to the 25 minute 23 second mark in the video above, you can view a comparison of exosomes and COVID-19 under the microscope.

From the 26 minute 43 second mark to the 28 minute 52 second mark in the video above, you can view the comparison of the characteristics of exosomes and COVID-19 which I have reproduced below.

Exosomes have the following characteristics:

  • Diameter inside cell: 500nm (nanometer, being one billionth of a metre or one millionth of a millimetre)
  • Diameter outside cell: 100nm
  • Receptor: ACE-2 (Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2)
  • Contains: RNA (Ribonucleic acid)
  • Found in: Bronchoalveolar fluid (lung fluid)

COVID-19 has the following characteristics:

  • Diameter inside cell: 500nm
  • Diameter outside cell: 100nm
  • Receptor: ACE-2
  • Contains: RNA
  • Found in: Bronchoalveolar fluid

Since the appearance and characteristics of exosomes and COVID-19 are the same, exosomes and COVID-19 are therefore one and the same thing.

The diagnostic tests being used to detect the presence of COVID-19 are testing for the presence of exosomes and then fraudulently diagnosing the subjects of the tests as having COVID-19 if the presence of exosomes is detected.

COVID-19 is not a virus and does not exist as a virus.  It is the fraudulent diagnosis applied to patients whose immune response to a range of illnesses and threats to their health has caused the cells inside their bodies to produce exosomes.

Those perpetrating the so-called Coronavirus hoax are preying on the lack of expertise amongst the citizenry in disease, immune response and diagnostic testing.  They are exploiting this lack of expertise amongst the citizenry in order to perpetrate fraud which revolves around the fraudulent diagnostic tests for COVID-19 that focus on detecting the presence of exosomes in the human body.

Dr Mohammad Iqbal Adil of the United Kingdom has confirmed the findings of Dr Andrew Kaufman and has the following qualifications and background:

  • MB BS, FRCSEd, FRCSI
  • Consultant General
  • Laparoscopic & Colorectal Surgeon
  • Bachelor of Medicine
  • Bachelor of Surgery
  • Fellow of Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
  • Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons Ireland
  • Chief Organiser & Founder Global Nishtarians Organisation
  • Three decades of experience working in one of the teaching hospitals in the United Kingdom

Dr Adil explains from the 4 minute mark to the 7 minute 5 second mark of the following video that COVID-19 is an exosome:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/nT0kbBDuOGa3/

You can play this video at 1.25x speed in order to hasten his slow speaking voice by bringing up the volume control at the bottom of the video, clicking on the cog icon to the right of the volume control and setting the speed to 1.25x.

As a result of exposing the so-called Coronavirus as a hoax, Dr Adil’s license to practice medicine was suspended for twelve months by the General Medical Council of the United Kingdom.

We are in Dr Adil’s debt for utilising the weight of his many years of expertise and experience from practicing medicine as a highly-qualified doctor and health professional in order to expose the so-called Coronavirus hoax.

The current push in western countries to make the wearing of masks mandatory is both a symbolic and practical extension of the widespread censorship that has permeated every aspect of western society, particularly over the past four years since the Brexit victory in the United Kingdom in 2016 and the victory of Trump supporters in the presidential election in the United States of America in 2016, in which they progressed their political agenda by electing a president who at least pretends to represent their interests.

The message conveyed by those perpetrating the so-called Coronavirus hoax to the citizenry through the push to make the wearing of masks mandatory can be summarised as follows:

“Shut up and do what we tell you.”

Those perpetrating the so-called Coronavirus hoax want to control every aspect of the lives of the citizenry.  They believe they can achieve this objective by promoting a narrative comprising falsehoods in order to create an alternate, false reality and by demanding that the citizenry conform their lives to this alternate, false reality.  They must be held accountable for this widespread and far-reaching fraud that they have engaged in.

Currently there is a concerted push to demonise Australian citizens who are opposed to the impending compulsory wearing of masks by attributing actions to them which they have not even taken.  Those perpetrating the so-called Coronavirus hoax have organised for graffiti to be sprayed in public places in opposition to the hoax in order to diminish the credibility of those opposed to the hoax in the public eye.  They have also organised for people to clash in an overly dramatic manner with retail staff and police in Victoria where the wearing of masks is mandatory in order to make those opposed to the hoax look ridiculous in the public eye when it is obviously the mandatory wearing of masks that is ridiculous.  These are dirty tactics that the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan perpetrating the so-called Coronavirus hoax has come to be known for.

These tactics are reported by the mainstream media in articles such as the following in order to give the impression that the actions in question were taken by those opposed to the so-called Coronavirus hoax:

https://www.smh.com.au/national/wearing-a-mask-will-protect-human-liberties-not-infringe-upon-them-20200727-p55fxa.html

See the first video on the web page above for the reporting of graffiti by the mainstream media.

There is no rational reason why anybody opposed to the so-called Coronavirus hoax would spray graffiti in public places because it is obvious that it reduces support for those opposed to this hoax instead of increasing it and that it therefore reduces opposition to the so-called Coronavirus hoax instead of increasing it.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/police-retail-employees-clash-with-victorians-refusing-to-wear-face-masks-20200726-p55fmi.html

See the first video on the web page above for footage of the overly dramatic manner of an agent of the perpetrators of the so-called Coronavirus hoax when clashing with retail staff and police.

There is no rational reason why anybody opposed to the so-called Coronavirus hoax would talk to retail staff and police in the overly dramatic and overly confrontational manner in which the agent of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan spoke to retail staff and police while she pretended to oppose the so-called Coronavirus hoax.  Predictably, the comments section of the latter article above has blown up with people outraged at her ridiculous manner, which has obviously served to reduce support for those opposed to this hoax instead of increasing it and which has therefore reduced opposition to the so-called Coronavirus hoax instead of increasing it.

These dirty tactics are part of the concerted push now underway in Australia to make the wearing of masks mandatory for all Australian citizens.  This is the epitome of absurdity, because the alleged coronavirus, named COVID-19, does not exist.

The Coronavirus is a scapegoat for the millions of deaths that the 5G network will cause

By Andrew Mackinnon

The Coronavirus originated in China and the perpetrators responsible for the creation of this virus, whether real or imagined, and for the creation of worldwide hysteria about the threat it poses, are Jews whose allegiance is to the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan.  Jews set up communism in China and control it today.  (They similarly set up communism in Russia.)  The virus originated in China as a cover for the real perpetrators behind this worldwide psychological attack on humanity – Jews.

I don’t know whether the Coronavirus is an actual virus or just a fabricated fiction. The reality is that viruses are undetectable by most people. Only a tiny fraction of the population has the equipment and expertise required to substantiate their existence. With trust in governments around the world already at an all-time low, citizens are unlikely to trust their governments to vouch for the existence of the Coronavirus and the severity of the threat it poses.

It is abundantly obvious that the small numbers of recorded infections and deaths resulting from the Coronavirus do not justify the draconian lockdowns of populations that have taken place all over the world in an hysterical manner.

Every day, there would have to be at least one in a hundred people who are physically ill with a cold virus or a flu virus. This translates to numbers of infections per day which far exceed the numbers of Coronavirus infections per day that have been recorded. Yet governments around the world don’t respond to this normal rate of illness among their citizens by prohibiting them from leaving home without a valid reason. The prohibitions that have arisen as a result of the Coronavirus are very paternalistic and very intrusive. Everybody knew that governments around the world and the armies of public servants they command were drunk on power before the Coronavirus hysteria hit but few people ever expected anything like the current draconian prohibitions. Government neurosis has advanced to the next level.

The Coronavirus is being used to bring about a number of changes in the world.  Primarily, it is being used to usher in an antichrist system of world government since it is claimed that the Coronavirus is a threat to the entire world.  However, it was also introduced to provide a false explanation for the high number of deaths which will occur worldwide if the 5G network is rolled out worldwide.  The rollout of the 5G network was the most significant thing happening worldwide before the Coronavirus hysteria hit.  However, it was happening very quietly because a lot of people are opposed to it.

The telecommunications companies keep putting out the line that citizens are demanding faster download speeds on their smartphones which is the justification for the rollout of the 5G network.  However, this is simply a marketing strategy or public relations strategy whereby the telecommunications companies put words into the mouths of the citizens and outrageously claim that the rollout of 5G is occurring because the citizenry is clammering for it.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  The rollout of 5G is occurring because the governments around the world and the telecommunications companies which are given “the keys to the city” by these governments are absolutely committed to this rollout.

People WILL die from the exposure to the 5G network but their deaths will be blamed on the Coronavirus to conceal the 5G network as the true cause of the deaths.  Hundreds of millions of people around the world will die, probably billions.

The 5G network emits much more powerful microwave energy than the existing 4G network.  This increased microwave energy causes increased oxidation of human cells (ie. corrosion) and decreases production of reproductive fluid in the human body which contains the DNA of the body and is essential for the daily growth and regeneration of cells in the body, as well as the repair of cellular damage in the body caused by oxidation. Microwave emissions, particularly from Wi-Fi modems in dwellings and ‘smart’ electricity meters on dwellings, also reduce the quality of human sleep so that the cellular growth and regeneration that takes place in the human body during sleep is greatly diminished and impeded.

The entire human body operates on the basis of finely-calibrated electrical signals in the body.  The microwave energy that the 5G network emits interferes with these naturally-generated electrical signals in the body so that the body’s biological processes, that are necessary to maintain health and wellbeing, are disrupted and degraded. The speed at which the human body ages is greatly increased when it is exposed to microwave emissions from Wi-Fi modems and ‘smart’ electricity meters.  Ongoing exposure to microwave energy from the 4G and 5G networks, particularly from proximate Wi-Fi modems, greatly accelerates the ageing process and makes it absolutely impossible to optimize the health and wellness of the human body. The current 4G network, particularly Wi-Fi, causes all of these problems in the human body but the 5G network will make them much worse due to the higher frequency microwave energy that the 5G network emits.

It is categorically not possible to attain maximum health and wellness in the human body when that human body is exposed to Wi-Fi modems of the 4G network on an ongoing basis.  This has been a pressing problem over the past ten years which has been highlighted by a tiny minority of pioneering individuals, who were largely ignored and sidelined with fraudulent arguments about “non-ionizing radiation”.  (Microwave energy that is non-ionizing can still interfere with the electrical signals in the human body that are necessary for proper biological functioning, such as cellular growth, regeneration and repair, and the maintenance of optimal health and wellbeing.  In any case, it is doubtful that the microwave energy emitted by Wi-Fi modems in the current 4G network and, particularly, the planned 5G network is, in fact, non-ionizing.)  The school administrators who ignored the complaints of teachers, parents and students in the United States of America over the past ten years about the negative health effects of Wi-Fi in schools should be in prison.  They have provided a textbook example of the common law principle of neglect of their fiduciary duty towards these teachers, parents and students.

All of the mobile phone towers that have been operating over the past twenty years and longer in countries around the world use much more electrical power than is necessary to support mobile phone communications.  They have been deliberately overpowered in order to blanket the citizenry with more intense microwave energy with the explicit objective of diminishing the health and wellbeing of the citizenry.  Excessive microwave energy (also known as electromagnetic energy) interferes with the finely calibrated nervous system of the human body, which operates on the basis of electrical impulses in the human body.  Exposure to excessive microwave energy causes apathy, fatigue and agitation.  It places the human body under physiological stress, which is exactly what those responsible for the construction of the mobile phone towers intended.

Does anybody seriously believe that governments around the world and the telecommunications companies that they have empowered built mobile phone networks in countries around the world because they want citizens in these countries to communicate more freely with each other?  Governments around the world don’t want citizens communicating more freely with each other.  If they did they would build as many public halls as possible, where citizens could meet in their hundreds and discuss issues that are of concern to them with each other in person.

The reason that mobile phone networks were constructed was not to facilitate freer communication amongst citizens.  The real reason was to blanket the citizenry with microwave energy in order to diminish the health and wellbeing of the citizenry.  After the mobile phone towers went up, people living next to them complained of the negative impacts on their health.  The media invariably commented that the mobile phone towers have been deemed safe by health authorities.  These people and their complaints were ignored by the media and by the government, which work together like hand in glove.  The government and the media are both controlled by people with Jewish ancestry.

The current rollout of the 5G network is the pinnacle of this agenda of using microwave energy to diminish the health and wellbeing of the citizenry.  Exposure to microwave energy emitted by 5G towers is going to kill people.

Microwave ovens use microwave energy at a frequency of 2.4GHz (ie. 2,400 MHz) in order to cook food by heating the water content in the food.  (Microwave ovens also emit microwave energy when they are turned on but not in use.  They were deliberately designed to blanket people’s homes with microwave energy many years before the advent of mobile phones and Wi-Fi.)  The mobile phone towers that are part of the current 4G network also emit microwave energy at similar frequency of 2.4GHz, but they use much more electrical energy to generate this microwave energy so that it is much more intense than the microwave energy emitted by microwave ovens.  Mobile phone towers blanket the citizenry with microwave energy everywhere they go.

The frequency of microwave energy that 5G towers emit is higher than 2.4GHz.  It will start at around 3.5GHz and keep increasing to many multiples of that.

In the United Kingdom, citizens are setting mobile phone towers, including 5G towers, on fire.  In the United States of America, there is talk of going out at night with scoped rifles and shooting the emitters of microwave energy on the towers in order to damage them so that they no longer emit microwave energy.

The Coronavirus has already been used as an excuse to start to ban cash in Australia.  Cash won’t be part of the antichrist world system.

The Coronavirus has already been used to ban gatherings of Christians in churches in Australia and many church leaders in Australia enthusiastically support this ban and the government that has enacted it because they’re tares with Jewish ancestry whose allegiance is to the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan.  Examples are Glenn Davies, the Archbishop of the Anglican Diocese of Sydney, Brian Houston, Senior Minster of Hillsong, and Phil Pringle, Senior Minister of C3 Church.  The Uniting Church in Australia is also controlled by tares with Jewish ancestry, as is the Salvation Army Church.

Everybody who receives a welfare payment from the government, such as unemployment benefits, disability benefits and possibly the old-age pension, will be required by law to be vaccinated for the Coronavirus in order to keep receiving the benefit.  However the purpose of the vaccination will not be to make people healthier but to make them sick.

The government will probably try to make vaccinations compulsory for all citizens.

There is abundant evidence from which to conclude that vaccination for the Coronavirus will be the means by which citizens around the world are implanted with a small microchip to enable all of their activities and affairs, including financial affairs, to be recorded and monitored – the mark of the beast referred to in Revelation 13:16-18 and Revelation 14:9-11 in the Bible.  The 5G network will enable continuous recording and monitoring of the information on these microchips wherever citizens go.  Bill Gates, who has Jewish ancestry, is heavily involved in this intended programme of vaccination and microchipping of the citizenry.

This is why the Australian economy isn’t working…

By Andrew Mackinnon

The economy in Australia was going very badly last year before the bushfires started that the government lit to distract attention away from the failing economy and before the latest Coronavirus hysteria to provide a scapegoat onto which to project the blame for the failing economies all around the world.  In Australia, the banks create money when they lend and then charge interest on it. This is the same in most countries around the world. However, the citizenry is waking up to this scam and is therefore reluctant to borrow from the banks. This has caused the size of the money supply in Australia to decrease since money is created when the banks lend and since money is destroyed when principal lent by the banks is repaid. As a result, there is insufficient money in circulation to support economic activity in Australia.  This is why the economy is languishing.

In fact, Australian citizens were reluctant to borrow from the banks even back in the 1990s in the aftermath of the recession of 1989 to 1991.  The Australian government has always responded to this reluctance not by acknowledging that the interest charged on money lent by the banks that they create out of nothing is unconscionable and unjust, but by bringing new citizens into Australia via mass immigration in the hope that they would borrow from the banks to make up the shortfall in borrowing.  It has been doing this for the past thirty years.  We are now in a situation where the Chinese who have come into the country don’t want to be in debt; the Indians who have come into the country don’t want to be in debt and the existing Australian citizens certainly don’t want to be in debt either.  Nobody wants to be in debt and why would they?  People are not stupid, even if the Australian government and the Jewish-controlled media have deliberately made it very difficult to understand how the banking system in Australia actually works.

In Australia, when banks lend for any purpose, they create that money and the size of the money supply subsequently increases.  The banks debit their loans asset account for the amount lent to signify the debt owing to them and they credit their deposits liability account to provide their customers with the amount they have lent to them so that their customers can utilise those funds in the bank accounts that they hold with the banks.  When principal lent by the banks is repaid, the customer’s deposit account out of which the payment is made decreases by the amount of the principal repaid so that the money supply in Australia decreases by this same amount.  The customer also makes interest payments out of his or her deposit account in the course of repaying the money borrowed.  These payments are credited to the revenue account of the bank that lent the customer the money and are used to pay the salaries of bank employees, with the remainder constituting the bank’s profit, out of which dividends are paid to the shareholders of the bank so that they can share in this interest revenue also.

The Reserve Bank of Australia was established in 1959 via the Reserve Bank Act.  It commenced operation early the next year on 14th January, 1960, just over 60 years ago.  The purpose of the Reserve Bank of Australia has always been to maximize the interest revenue collected by the banks under its authority, which were first publicly owned then later privately owned by shareholders.

In 2015, in Australia, which had a population of about 24 million people at the time, about $30 billion dollars was paid to the staff who run the banks and another $30 billion was earned in profits for the shareholders of these privately-owned banks, all courtesy of the fraud of interest charged on money created out of nothing and lent to the citizenry.  That’s a total of $60 billion in one year paid in interest to the banks by Australian citizens on money that the banks created out of nothing and lent to them. It’s the equivalent of $3,185 paid in 2015 by every adult citizen of Australia aged 18 years and over to the banks in interest. Around 78.5% of the population of 24 million in 2015 was aged 18 years and over, being around 18,840,000 citizens.

97% of the money in circulation in Australia, constituting the money supply, is money created by the banks when they lend for any purpose.  The other 3% is physical notes and coins.  The majority of this 97% arises from mortgage lending.  The majority of the money that banks create is the result of mortgage lending.  Mortgage lending constitutes the majority of bank lending.  When a bank lends money to a customer as a mortgage with which to purchase real estate, the customer pays the overwhelming majority of the amount borrowed to the seller of the real estate that the customer chooses to purchase.  Apart from stamp duty paid on the real estate purchase by the customer to state governments, commissions paid to real estate agents on the sale of the real estate by the seller and perhaps renovations of the real estate purchased, carried out by the customer using part of the money they have borrowed from the bank to fund their purchase of the property, the only way that newly created money as a result of mortgage lending is going to make its way into the economy and into the hands of Australian citizens is if the seller whose house has been purchased as a result of that mortgage lending spends the money they receive as a result of selling their house.  If they predominantly invest the money in assets such as real estate or shares, then the majority of the money is not going to find its way into the economy involving the day to day transactions of the majority of Australian citizens.

This problem has been even further exacerbated by the inflation of house prices as a result of increased demand for housing via mass immigration and via concessions made to property ‘investors’ (who borrow from the banks so that they can ‘invest’) via negative gearing so that they will be able to afford the repayments on their mortgages for their ‘investment’ properties, which they otherwise wouldn’t be able to afford.  They wouldn’t otherwise have sufficient cash flow to afford the repayments.  As a result of the inflation of house prices, the proportion of money in circulation in Australia as a result of mortgage lending by the banks is even higher.

In Australia, we need a money supply in which a large proportion of the money supply didn’t come into existence as a result of lending.  There are activities that occur on a regular, consistent and ongoing basis in order to support the lives of Australia citizens, such as the growing and distribution of food, the production and distribution of electricity and the accumulation and distribution of water and gas, to name just a few.  These activities need to be supported by a large proportion of the money supply that didn’t come into existence as a result of bank lending but instead came into existence as a result of government spending over time, such as payment by the government of the salaries of citizens employed in the public service in Australia.

The problem that many Australian citizens are currently experiencing is that there is insufficient money in circulation as a result of a decline in borrowing by Australian citizens from the banks.  In addition, the supply of money that is in circulation does not offer stable support to their day-to-day economic activity.  Because 97% of the money in circulation is created via bank lending, the size of the money supply is in a constant state of change.  When principal is lent by the banks, the money supply increases in size.  When principal is repaid by borrowers, the money supply decreases in size.

In contrast, money that is in circulation as a result of government spending can only be taken out of circulation if the government decides to destroy money that it has collected via taxation because it believes that there is too much money in circulation which is causing excessive inflation of prices.

The way money is created in Australia needs to change.  The Australian government should be responsible for money creation, not the privately-owned banks.  The size of the money supply in Australia shouldn’t depend on citizens borrowing money.  The only entity that should have the authority to create money in Australia and control the size of the money supply in Australia is the Australian federal government which would create money via a publicly-owned Australian Federal Bank by spending it into circulation or lending it to Australian citizens or Australian businesses for any purpose, including mortgages.  The Australian Federal Bank would not charge interest when it lends, however it would need to charge a rate in the vicinity of 0.5% to 1% on all lending to cover the incidence of default on the loans by the borrowers.  This rate would be different for different types of lending, such as mortgages and business loans.  The sole purpose of this rate would be to cover the incidence of default on loans (ie. non-repayment of principal borrowed), not to profit from the lending.

There would have to be some mechanism for limiting government lending to the citizenry since the publicly-owned Australian Federal Bank would create all of the money that it lends so that the money supply increases when it lends. Unrestrained lending would lead to a rapidly increasing money supply and associated inflation of prices.

Citizens would be able to borrow in order to buy a house to live in and possibly a holiday house but they wouldn’t be allowed to borrow in order to buy a house as an investment to rent out in order to earn income. Investment would need to be funded out of savings, including houses and shares to name just two investments.

The amount that the Australian Federal Bank would lend to any given citizen for any given purpose, such as buying a house to live in, would be limited by factors such as the income of the citizen and the size of the deposit that the citizen has saved towards the purchase, with zero dollars obviously being the minimum possible size of the deposit saved. The Australian Federal Bank would decide upon the multiple of any given citizen’s income (such as three times) to lend to them for any given purpose, such as buying a house to live in or buying a motor vehicle.

If necessary, the Australian government could also create money and bring it into circulation in order to increase the money suppy by giving the money to the citizenry in proportion to the amount of net tax they’ve paid during their lives, defined as tax paid minus money received from the government in this manner as a result of money creation by the government.

The Australian Federal Bank would be run on a not-for-profit basis whereby the cost of running its operation would be covered by transaction fees and account keeping fees that reflect the true costs incurred by the bank to process transactions and maintain the accounts of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and other entities such as publicly-owned utilities, public service organisations and local government areas.

There would no longer be any need for the Australian government to borrow money by issuing government bonds to those from who it borrows, as is currently the case.  This borrowing needs to repaid with interest (ie. principal and interest) out of taxation revenue, paid by the citizenry, when the Australian government could easily create this money to fund its spending requirements without requiring the citizenry to repay it via taxation or pay interest on it via taxation.

Our current predicament in which privately-owned banks create money out of nothing when they lend and then charge interest on it is a Jewish fraud whose perpetrators are committed to protecting it at all costs.  The Coronavirus hoax has been instigated worldwide in order to provide a reason for the failing economies around the world which draws attention away from the real reason – insufficient money in circulation in countries all around the world as a result of insufficient borrowing from the privately-owned banks by citizens in countries all around the world who rightfully view the banks with distrust and disdain.

Providing a sound monetary system for the citizenry is one of the most important services that a sound government is obligated to provide.  There is absolutely no reason whatsoever why any money in circulation should obligate citizens to pay interest on it, whether interest to privately-owned banks or interest to bondholders.  When citizens pay interest to privately-owned banks as a result of money borrowed, they receive nothing of value in return, because the money lent to them was created out of nothing by the banks.  This is a cleverly-disguised system of slavery whereby the citizenry work to earn the money required to pay the interest without receiving anything of value in return for that money.  The recipients of the interest paid, being the bank employees and the shareholders of the banks, use the interest paid to buy the goods and services that the citizenry produce in the course of earning the money to pay the interest.  This is a massive transfer of wealth from those paying the interest to those receiving the interest.  Over the course of repaying a mortgage on a house, a borrower from a privately-owned bank under our current banking system pays in the vicinity of 80% of the principal amount borrowed in interest to the bank.  This borrower repays the principal amount borrowed and also pays an additional amount to the bank as interest equivalent to around 80% of the principal amount borrowed.

If the principal amount borrowed is $500,000, the total amount repaid to the bank over the life of the mortgage is around $900,000.  When the bank lent the $500,000 principal, a bank employee processed the paperwork and typed the $500,000 into a computer so that this money, created out of nothing with a few keystrokes, was available in the account of the borrower.  In return for this negligible amount of work to lend the $500,000, the bank is repaid $900,000, which includes $400,000 in interest.  About half of the interest of $400,000 is paid to bank employees as salaries and the remaining $200,000 is booked as profit, out of which dividends are paid to the bank’s shareholders.

We have been living under slave conditions for decades now.  The Coronavirus hysteria is intended to keep us in slave conditions by providing a reason for the failing economies around the world which distracts from the real reason – the Jewish fraud of interest charged by the banks on money created out of nothing when they lend.  The Jewish perpetrators of the Coronavirus hysteria intend to start new monetary systems in countries around the world in the aftermath of this hoax which similarly enshrine this Jewish fraud as their centerpieces.